期刊文献+

基于Topsis法的安徽省城市竞争力比较分析

Study on Urban Competiveness of Anhui Province Based on Topsis Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于安徽省16个地级市的横截面数据,运用Topsis方法比较分析安徽省各城市的竞争力,结果表明安徽省各城市由于在自然区位、社会区位和产业结构因素方面的差异存在发展不均衡的问题,城市发展在综合经济、财政金融、国内贸易、对外开放与依存、城镇化水平、居民生活、教育与科技、环境水平8个方面存在显著差异。在成因分析的基础上,认为支持落后城市发展,发挥比较优势,政府适度引导,完善科技体系和重视生态坏境保护是促进各城市协调发展的有效途径。 This article concludes an analysis of urban competiveness of Anhui province as well as the reasons for the differences based on topsis method using the cross sectional data of 16 cities in Anhui. It ’s found development differences among the 16 cities are significant on hands of general economic, finance, domestic trade, international trade, urbanization, living standard of residents, technology, education and the environment quality. The reasons include natural factors, social factors and the difference of industrial structure. Suggestions for improving competiveness and synergetic development are also provided including supporting backward cities, making full use of comparative advantages, enhancing government guidance, valuing and improving technology, education and the environment quality.
作者 严清清
出处 《保定学院学报》 2014年第5期82-87,共6页 Journal of Baoding University
关键词 城市竞争力 安徽省 TOPSIS 城市横截面数据 协同发展 urban competiveness Anhui province Topsis the cross sectional data of cities synergetic development
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献32

  • 1朱红根,彭道宾.江西省各城市综合竞争力比较研究——因子分析法及其应用[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2005,4(2):51-53. 被引量:10
  • 2郁玉兵,曹卫东.安徽省城市竞争力比较研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2007(1):3-5. 被引量:11
  • 3候景新,尹卫红.区域经济学分析方法[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004:132.
  • 4D. Diakoulaki, G. Mavrotas and L. Papayannakis 《Determining objective weights in multiple crireria pmblenrs: The CRITIC method.》 Computer Ops Res 22, 763 - 770. 1995.
  • 5迈克尔·波特.竞争论[M].北京:中信出版社,2003..
  • 6迈克尔·波特.国家竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002.
  • 7Gordon I R, Cheshire P C. Location Advantage and the Les- sons of Territorial Competition in Europe [M]. Sweden: Ud-devalla, 1998.
  • 8Edward J M. Hard and Soft Networks for Urban Competitive- ness [ J ]. Urban Studies, 2002,39 (5/6) : 929-945.
  • 9C L Hwang, K Yoon. Muhiple Attribute decision making: methods and applications [ M ]. Berlin: Springer, 1981.
  • 10D L Olson. Comparison of Weights in TOPSIS Models [ J ]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling,2004, (40).

共引文献839

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部