西方城市规划公众参与方式的分类研究——基于理论的视角被引量：11

A Classification Study of Western Public Participation Approaches in Urban Planning: Based on the Theoretical Perspective

原文传递

导出

摘要对西方城市规划公众参与方式理论进行分类研究可以找到这些理论背后的规则,进而通过规则适配进行参与方式的选择。本研究综合了安斯汀和米切纳分类的优点,以参与权力分配为依据进行了新的分类研究。新依据下的三种参与方式在权力分配、参与目的及社会作用上各具特色,以此引申出的优缺点构成了参与方式选择的情景条件。在此基础上,研究论述了三种参与方式在我国的适用性及实践基础,建立了适于我国城市规划编制体系的参与方式选择标准。 Studying the classification of public participation approach theory in the west is the best way to find the implication rules among them. These approaches can be applied selectively through rules adaptation. Combined the advantages of Arnstein＇s theory and Michener＇s theory, this study focuses on the new classification based on the power distribution between the government and participators. Advantages and disadvantages of the three kinds of participation approaches which come from the features on the power allocation, participation purpose and social effect, compose of the situational conditions for participation approaches selecting. On this basis, this study discusses the applicability and the practice basis of the three kinds of participation approaches in China, and establishes the selection criteria for Chinese urban planning system.

作者莫文竞

机构地区同济大学建筑与城市规划学院

出处《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期76-82,共7页 Urban Planning International

关键词城市规划公众参与公众参与方式分类研究选择标准 Public Participation in Urban Planning Approach of Public Participation Classification Study Selection Criteria

分类号 TU984 [建筑科学—城市规划与设计]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1Sherry R. Amstein. A Ladder of Citizen Participation[J]. American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35(4): 216-224.
2Yap Nonita T. Round the Peg or Square the Hole? Populists, Technocrats and Environmental Assessment in Third World Countries[J]. Impact Assessment Bulletin, 1990, 8(1-2): 69-83.
3Dorcey Anthony H J. Public Involvement in Government Decision- making: Choosing the Right Model[R]. Victor: B.C. Round Table on the Environment and Economy, 1994.
4Thornley Andrew. Theoretical Perspectives on Planning Participation[M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977.
5Yvonne Rydin, Mark Pennington. Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential of Social Capital[J]. Local Environment, 2000, 5(2): 153-169.
6Webler T, Tuler S. Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making: Combined Results from 10 Case Studies[J]. Policy Studies Journal, 2006, 34(4): 699-722.
7Michener Victoria J. The Participation Approach: Contradiction and Co- option in Burkina Faso[J]. World Development, 1998, 26(12): 2105-2118.
8Ank Michels. Citizen for Participation in Local Policy Making: Design and Democracy[J]. International Journal of Public Administration, 2012, 35(4): 285-292.
9Rosser C. Action Planning in Calcutta: The Problem of Community Participation Planning and Development Studies: Some Reflection on Social Planning[M]. London: Frank Cass, 1970.
10Pun K S. Local Authorities' and Human Settlement Development in Hong Kong[C]. ESCAP/13angkok, 1982.