期刊文献+

胸腔积液及血清中CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE检测在肺癌鉴别诊断中的意义 被引量:5

Differential diagnosis significance of detection of CEA,CYFRA21-1 and NSE in pleural effusion and serum for lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸腔积液和血清中癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)检测在肺癌的鉴别诊断和病理分型中的临床价值。方法将180例胸腔积液患者分为良性胸腔积液组(55例)和肺癌组(125例),分别对各组患者胸腔积液和血清中的CEA、NSE和CYFRA21-1水平进行检测,并对检测结果进行比对分析。结果肺癌组胸腔积液和血清中的CEA、NSE和CYFRA21-1水平均明显高于良性胸腔积液组(P<0.05)。肺癌组中,腺癌组胸腔积液和血清中的CEA水平明显高于良性胸腔积液组,同时高于鳞癌组和小细胞肺癌组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);鳞癌组胸腔积液和血清中的CYFRA21-1水平明显高于良性胸腔积液组,同时高于腺癌组和小细胞肺癌组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);小细胞肺癌组胸腔积液和血清中的NSE水平明显高于良性胸腔积液组,同时高于腺癌组和鳞癌组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。CEA在腺癌组中的检测阳性率高于鳞癌组和小细胞肺癌组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CYFRA21-1在鳞癌组中的检测阳性率高于腺癌组和小细胞肺癌组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);NSE在小细胞肺癌组中的阳性率高于鳞癌组和腺癌组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论胸腔积液及血清中CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE分别是腺癌、鳞癌和小细胞肺癌的较特异的肿瘤标志物,对肺癌的鉴别诊断和病理分型有一定的临床意义。 Objective To explore clinical value of detection of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) ,cytokeratin 19 fragment(CY-FRA21-1) and neuron specific enolization enzyme(NSE) in pleural effusion and serum during the differential diagnosis and patho-logical classification of lung cancer .Methods 180 patients with pleural effusion were divided into two groups ,one including 55 be-nign pleural effusion cases(benign pleural effusion group) and the other including 125 lung cancer cases(lung cancer group) .CEA , NSE and CYFRA21-1 in pleural effusion and serum of two groups were measured ,respectively ,and the measure results between two groups were conducted .Results CEA ,NSE and CYFRA21-1 levels in lung cancer group were significantly higher than those in benign pleural effusion group(P〈0 .05) .CEA levels in pleural effusion and serum in lung adenocarcinoma group were significantly higher than those in benign pleural effusion group ,lung squamous carcinoma group and small cell lung cancer group(P〈0 .05) .CY-FRA21-1 levels in pleural effusion and serum in lung squamous carcinoma group were significantly higher than those in benign pleu-ral effusion group ,lung adenocarcinoma group and small cell lung cancer group(P〈0 .01) .NSE levels in pleural effusion and serum in small cell lung cancer group were significantly higher than those in benign pleural effusion group ,lung adenocarcinoma group and lung squamous carcinoma group(P〈 0 .01) .The positive detection rate of CEA in lung adenocarcinoma group was significantly higher than that in lung squamous carcinoma group and small cell lung cancer group(P〈0 .05) .The positive detection rate of CY-FRA21-1 in lung squamous carcinoma group was significantly higher than that in lung adenocarcinoma group and small cell lung cancer group(P〈0 .05) .The positive detection rate of NSE in small cell lung cancer group was significantly higher than that in lung squamous carcinoma group and lung adenocarcinoma group(P〈0 .01) .Conclusion CEA ,CYFRA21-1 and NSE in pleural effusion and serum are specific tumor markers of lung adenocarcinoma ,lung squamous carcinoma and small cell lung cancer ,respectively , which may have a certain clinical significance for the differential diagnosis and pathological classification of lung cancer .
作者 张淑艳 王娜
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第19期2613-2615,共3页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 胸腔积液 肿瘤标志物 肺腺癌 肺鳞癌 小细胞肺癌 pleural effusion tumor markers lung adenocarcinoma squamous cell lung carcinoma small cell lung cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献101

共引文献122

同被引文献51

  • 1孙耕耘.胸腔积液的诊断与治疗进展[J].临床肺科杂志,2005,10(2):141-143. 被引量:78
  • 2孙静,刘静,杨炳军.胃泌素释放肽前体和神经元特异性烯醇化酶对小细胞肺癌的临床应用价值[J].现代检验医学杂志,2005,20(4):11-13. 被引量:11
  • 3王伟霞,高红军,刘晓晴.小细胞肺癌患者血清胃泌素释放肽前体的临床意义研究[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2006,20(8):547-549. 被引量:10
  • 4金欣,陈建魁,佟雅丽,尹秀云,黄媛,郑纳新,左向华.血清ProGRP对小细胞肺癌的诊断和疗效判断价值[J].军事医学科学院院刊,2006,30(4):354-356. 被引量:14
  • 5Liu L, Liu B, Zhu LL, et al. Clinical significance of CYFRA21-1, Sec-Ag and telomerase activity in serum and pleural effusion of patients with squamous-ceU lung cancer [J].Bioanalysis, 2012, 4 (19) : 2367-2374.
  • 6Lee DS, Kim SJ, Kang JH, et al. Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and the Risk of Whole-body Metastatic Potential in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer [J]. J Cancer, 2014, 5 (8) : 663-669.
  • 7Yang ZM, Ding XP, Pen L, et al. Analysis of CEA expressionand EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancers [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2014,15 (8) :3451-3455.
  • 8Qin HF, Qu LL, Liu H, et al. Serum CEA level change and its significance before and after Gefitinib therapy on patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2013,14(7) :4205-4208.
  • 9Ma S, Shen L, Qian N, et al. The prognostic values of CA125, CA19.9, NSE, AND SCC for stage I NSCLC are limited [J]. Cancer Biomark, 2011-2012(3-4) : 155-162.
  • 10Fiala O, Pesek M, Finek J, et al. Predictive role of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with erlotinib [J]. Anticancer Res, 2014,34(6) : 3205-3210.

引证文献5

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部