期刊文献+

启发性挫败的设计研究——翻转课堂的实施策略 被引量:38

Designing Productive Failure for Flipping the Classroom
下载PDF
导出
摘要 翻转课堂作为一种新的教学组织形式和教学理念,借助微课等技术,为实现学生的自主个性化学习提供了极大的可能性。但是,无论是目前的微课设计,还是翻转课堂的组织、设计,都存在诸多问题。翻转课堂实质是以学生为中心的,基于问题探究的自主、个性化学习,是对传统的以教师为中心的讲授型教学的一种颠覆,因此翻转课堂、微课学习资源的设计需要一种全新的视角和模式,以支持学生的自主个性化学习。基于这一假设,该研究提出了适合翻转课堂教学组织形式的启发性挫败设计。该文详细论述了启发性挫败设计的四个相互依赖的机制(启发性挫败的问题设计、元认知活动设计、参与结构设计和学习文化的设计),以及原则和原理,以期为翻转课堂理论与实践的发展,微课的设计等提供新的视角和模式。 Flipping the classroom, as new pedagogy, has recently gained prominence due to advances in technology and increased ubiquitous access to computers and other mobile devices. It provides great potential for personalizing learning. The nature of lfipping the classroom is inquiry-based self-regulated personalized learning, centering around students. At present, many problems exist in designing for lfipped classrooms. Thus, we need a new perspective to design lfipped classrooms to support self-regulated personalized learning. Productive failure may provide a new avenue for lfipping the classroom. This study provides a detailed description on the four core interdependent mechanisms of productive failure--novel and complex problem design, metacognitive activities design, par-ticipating structure design and social surround design--the core design principles to embody the four mechanisms. Finally, the study concludes with implications of future research directions.
作者 杨玉芹
出处 《中国电化教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第11期111-115,共5页 China Educational Technology
关键词 启发性挫败 翻转课堂 自主个性化学习 微课 MOOCs Productive Failure Flipping the Classroom Self-regulated Personalized Learning Microcourse MOOCs
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1汪晓东,张晨婧仔.“翻转课堂”在大学教学中的应用研究——以教育技术学专业英语课程为例[J].现代教育技术,2013,23(8):11-16. 被引量:723
  • 2Kapur, M. Productive Failure[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 2008, 26(3): 379-424.
  • 3Kaput, M. A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: unpacking the design components[J]. Instructional Science, 2011, 39(4): 561-579.
  • 4Kapur, M., &Bielaczyc, K. Designing for Productive Failure[J]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2012, 21 ( 1 ): 45-83.
  • 5Kapur, M. Comparing Learning From Produc- tive Failure and Vicarious Failure[J]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013, 22 (1): 1-27.
  • 6Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. Inventing to Prepare for Fu- ture Learning: The Hidden Efficiency of Encouraging Original Student Production in Statistics Instruction[J]. Cognition and Instruction, 2004, 22(2): 129-184.
  • 7Siler, S. A., Klahr, D., & Price, N. Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparation for future learning activity[J]. Instructional Science, 2013, 41(1): 191-216.
  • 8刘儒德.基于问题学习对教学改革的启示[J].教育研究,2002,23(2):73-77. 被引量:355
  • 9张建伟.基于问题解决的知识建构[J].教育研究,2000,21(10):58-62. 被引量:182
  • 10Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of con- structivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2006, 41(2): 75-86.

二级参考文献37

共引文献1247

同被引文献290

引证文献38

二级引证文献204

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部