摘要
事案阐明义务论作为大陆法系民事诉讼法学前沿理论,在解决现代型案件证明困境问题上发挥了有力作用。但这一概念的提出却对作为现代民事诉讼制度基石的辩论主义和证明责任制度形成了挑战,其产生与发展也正是围绕着与辩论主义及证明责任的关系问题而展开的。当今各国阐明义务一般化的趋势比较明朗,这尤其对于传统上注重追求案件客观真实的我国诉讼制度具有巨大的诱惑力。但目前引进无限制的"事案阐明义务"会使我国司法改革辛苦建构起来的证明责任制度及民事诉讼模式转型前功尽弃。其积极意义只不过在于在特定的案件类型中以此理论可弥补证明责任分配可能的弊端。
The obligations of clarify the case as frontier theory in civil proceedings law,has played a strong role in addressing the plight of prove in the modern cases. But the concept put forward a challenge to the Adversary system and the Burden of Proof theory which formed the basis of the modern civil litigation system. But the concept proposed formation of a challenge but then civil litigation system as a cornerstone of modern debate doctrine and burden of proof system. Its emergence and development is also around this issue. In today＇s world the generalized trend of the obligations of Clarify the case is clearer,this is especially has great temptation for our traditional litigation system which focus on the pursuit of objective truth. But the introduction of unlimited ＂ the obligations of Clarify the case ＂ will make our judicial reform and the model transformation of civil litigation complete failure. The positive sense of this theory only may be possible to make up for the shortcomings of the burden of proof in certain types of cases.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期103-112,共10页
Legal Forum
基金
江西省高校人文社科重点研究基地招标课题<民事证据立法问题研究>(JD1346)的阶段性成果
关键词
事案阐明义务
辩论主义
证明责任
一般化趋势
the obligations of clarify the case
adversary system
burden of proof
generalized trend
