摘要
2012年刑诉法的再修改,在酌定不起诉的基础上,又增设了附条件不起诉,进一步扩大了起诉裁量权的空间。但与此背反的是,在目前法治环境和制度结构下,起诉裁量存在着缺乏程序正当化构造、业绩考核不合理、起诉裁量基准不明确、不起诉替代性处置措施不足等病理,严重影响了起诉裁裁量权运行的合法性和有效性,诱发了检察机关基于组织理性严格控制起诉裁量权的行动逻辑;检察官基于个体理性懈怠行使起诉裁量权的策略行为,使起诉裁量权的"怠用"固化为可怕司法惯性。必须从增强起诉裁量权运行的合法性和有效性入手,构建起诉裁量的正当化程序,明确起诉裁量标准,充实不起诉替代性处置措施,增强社会公众理解认同、增加检察官中立性,进而改变检察组织和检察官的行动逻辑,实现起诉裁量权从价值回归到理性回归。
2012 points to modify again, on the basis of discretion not to prosecute, and add the attach conditions not to prosecute, further expand the space of prosecution discretion, But at the back of the is that under the present system and the rule of law environment and structure, prosecution discretion to justify structure, there is a lack of program performance is not reasonable, the prosecution discretion benchmark is not clear, not to prosecute insufficient alternative disposal measures such as pathology, seriously has affected the prosecution discretion to cutting the legitimacy and effectiveness, and induce the procuratorial organs based on organizational rational strictly control the action logic of prosecutiondiscretion; Prosecutor is based on the strategic behavior of individual rationality slack exercise of prosecution discretion, make the prosecution discretion ＂idle＂ terrible curing for judicial inertia. Must be from enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of prosecution discretion, construction of prosecution discretion to justify procedures, clear standard of prosecution discretion, enrich not to prosecute alternative disposal measures, strengthen social neutrality, increase public understanding of identity, prosecutors, in turn, change the procuratorial organization and prosecutors action logic, realization of prosecution discretion from the value return to rational regression.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第12期188-195,共8页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
起诉裁量权
检察组织
检察官
价值
理性
prosecution discretion
procuratorial organization
value
rationality of public
procurators
