摘要
目的比较3种面部蠕形螨检测方法的阳性率、感染度、虫体计数及形态构成,探讨不同检测方法的检测效果。方法选择开封地区不同年龄、不同性别、不同职业的居民500例作为研究对象,分别采用刮脂法、挤刮法和透明胶带法对每一研究对象进行面部蠕形螨检测。结果 500例受试者刮脂法阳性116例,其中轻度感染40例,中度感染36例,重度感染40例,检出虫数505只,包括成虫、若虫、幼虫和虫卵;挤刮法阳性98例,其中轻度感染36例,中度感染34例,重度感染28例,检出虫数315只,也包括各期虫体和虫卵;透明胶带法阳性68例,其中轻度感染28例,中度感染26例,重度感染14例,检出虫数205只,包括成虫和若虫,未检出幼虫和虫卵。结论 3种面部蠕形螨检测方法的检测效果不同,以刮脂法效果最好。
Objective We compared the three detecting methods to facial domodex from the positive rate, infection degree, the number of the worms and its different shapes, and investigated the effects of different methods. Methods We chose 500 resi- dents from different occupations, age groups, and gender in Kaifeng area as the research objects. Respectively we detect facial demodex on each object by using the scraping method, squeezing - scraping method and transparent adhesive tape method to and. Results By scraping method, of the 500 patients, the positive rate was 116 cases, the mild was 40, the moderate infec- tion was 36, the severe infection was 40, the number of worms was 505, including adults, nymphs , larvae and eggs. By squee- zing - scraping method, the positive rate was 98 eases, the mild infection was 36, the moderate infection was 34, the severe in- fection was 28, the number of worms was 315, we also found all the shapes of different worms. By transparent adhesive tape method, the positive rate was 68 cases, the mild was 28, the moderate infection was 26, the severe infection was 14, the num- ber of worms was 205, of which only adults, nymphs, we could not detect the larvae and eggs. Conclusion Three kinds of fa- cial demodex detection methods have different effects, with scraping method it has the best effect, detection detection.
出处
《中国卫生检验杂志》
北大核心
2014年第20期2943-2945,共3页
Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词
面部蠕形螨
检测方法
方法学比较
Facial demodex
Detection method
Method comparison
