期刊文献+

Experimental studies on flow visualization and velocity field of compression ramp with different incoming boundary layers 被引量:1

Experimental studies on flow visualization and velocity field of compression ramp with different incoming boundary layers
原文传递
导出
摘要 Experimental studies which focus on flow visualization and the velocity field of a supersonic laminar/turbulent flow over a compression ramp were carried out in a Mach 3.0 wind tunnel. Fine flow structures and velocity field structures were obtained via NPLS (nanoparticle-tracer planar laser scattering) and PIV (particle image velocimetry) techniques, time- averaged flow structures were researched, and spatiotemporal evolutions of transient flow structures were analyzed. The flow visualization results indicated that when the ramp angles were 25~, a typical separation occurred in the laminar flow, some typical flow structures such as shock induced by the boundary layer, separation shock, reversed flow and reattachment shock were visible clearly. While a certain extent separation occurred in turbulent flow, the separation region was much smaller. When the ramp angles were 28~, laminar flow separated further, and the separation region expanded evidently, flow structures in the separation region were complex. While a typical separation occurred in turbulent flow, reversed flow structures were significant, flow structures in the separation region were relatively simple. The experimental results of velocity field were corresponding to flow visualization, and the velocity field structures of both compression ramp flows agreed with the flow structures well. There were three layered structures in the U component velocity, and the V component velocity appeared like an oblique "v". Some differences between these two compression ramp flows can be observed in the velocity profiles of the shear layer and the shearing intensity. Experimental studies which focus on flow visualization and the velocity field of a supersonic laminar/turbulent flow over a compression ramp were carried out in a Mach 3.0 wind tunnel. Fine flow structures and velocity field structures were obtained via NPLS (nanoparticle-tracer planar laser scattering) and PIV (particle image velocimetry) techniques, time- averaged flow structures were researched, and spatiotemporal evolutions of transient flow structures were analyzed. The flow visualization results indicated that when the ramp angles were 25~, a typical separation occurred in the laminar flow, some typical flow structures such as shock induced by the boundary layer, separation shock, reversed flow and reattachment shock were visible clearly. While a certain extent separation occurred in turbulent flow, the separation region was much smaller. When the ramp angles were 28~, laminar flow separated further, and the separation region expanded evidently, flow structures in the separation region were complex. While a typical separation occurred in turbulent flow, reversed flow structures were significant, flow structures in the separation region were relatively simple. The experimental results of velocity field were corresponding to flow visualization, and the velocity field structures of both compression ramp flows agreed with the flow structures well. There were three layered structures in the U component velocity, and the V component velocity appeared like an oblique "v". Some differences between these two compression ramp flows can be observed in the velocity profiles of the shear layer and the shearing intensity.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第11期384-395,共12页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.11172326 and 11302256)
关键词 compression ramp incoming boundary layer fine flow structure velocity field compression ramp, incoming boundary layer, fine flow structure, velocity field
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Wu M and Martin M P 2007 AIAA J. 45 879.
  • 2Loginov M S, Adams N A and Zheltovodov A A 2006 J. Fluid Mech. 565 135.
  • 3Gieseking D A and Edwards J R 2012 AIAA J. 50 2057.
  • 4Lee C and Wang S 1995 Exp. Fluids 19 143.
  • 5Settles G S, Fitzpatrick T J and Bogdonoff S M 1979 AIAA J. 17 579.
  • 6Smits A J and Muck K C 1987 J. Fluid Mech. 182 291.
  • 7Chan S C, Clemens N T and Dolling D S 1995 AIAA Paper 2195.
  • 8Narayanaswamy V, Raja L and Clemens N 2012 Phys. Fluids. 24 076101.
  • 9Ganapathisubramani B, Clemens N T and Dolling D S 2009 J. Fluid Mech. 636 397.
  • 10Zheltovodov A A 2006 AIAA Paper 0496.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部