期刊文献+

政治隐喻中的意识形态 被引量:7

Ideology in Political Metaphor
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章以认知语言学中的概念隐喻为观察视角,选取中美两国政要互访期间在六所重点大学的演讲为语料进行研究,以揭示政治隐喻背后暗含的意识形态。统计数据显示在中美两国政要的演讲中,其隐喻的类型多达21种,可见政治隐喻的丰富和多样性。总体而言,汉语中概念隐喻更具普遍性。文章同时对中、美各方前五种隐喻以及中美独有的隐喻进行了详细的分析、对比和探讨,发现政治语篇中的概念隐喻具有一定的民族文化色彩和约定性。另外,文章借助统计软件包SPSS16.0对中美政要运用的隐喻频率进行了显著性差异对比分析和讨论。在概念隐喻与意识形态的关系上,研究表明概念隐喻具有意识形态建构功能,而意识形态制约着概念隐喻的生成和运用。 Ideology has been the focus of politics and sociology.The research into the ideology in political metaphor has been done on the basis of corpus of the speeches of topleadersofbothChinaandtheUSinsix top universities of both countries.Data in the paper show that over 21 categories of metaphors are employed in these speeches,thus indicating the richness and diversity of political metaphor.Generally speaking,metaphors are more commonly used in Chinese.Also specific analysis,comparison and contrast have also been made concerning the top five metaphors as well as the unique metaphors in both Chinese and the US leaders' speeches.The research shows that conceptual metaphors in political discourse are characterized by culture and conventionality.Meanwhile the frequency of metaphor using by leaders of both sides is counted and analyzed in detail.Regarding the relationship between conceptual metaphors and ideologies,this study indicates that the former have a function of constructing the latter while the latter restrict the formation and application of the former.
作者 贺梦依
机构地区 遵义医学院
出处 《当代外语研究》 2014年第9期17-23,76-77,共7页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
基金 贵州省教育厅高校人文社会科学研究项目"认知语言学视角下的意识形态研究"(编号11SSD006)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Fairclough, N. 2003. Analyzing Discourse : Textual Analysis for Social Research [M]. London: Routledge.
  • 2Gerard, S. 2002. Identifying metaphor in language: A cognitive approach [J]. Style 36(3): 386-407.
  • 3Johnson, M. 2008. Philosophy's debt to metaphor [A]. 1 R. Gibbs (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metapho and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge Universil Press. 39-52.
  • 4Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 5Minsky, M. A. 1974. Framework for representing knowledge [J]. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306(6) & 1-106.
  • 6Oliveira, R. P. 2001. Language and ideology-An interview with George Lakoff [A]. In D. Hawkins & E. Sandikioglu ( eds. ). Language and Ideology [ C]. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • 7Thompson, S. 1996. Politics without metaphor is like a fish without water [A]. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (eds.). Metaphor: Implications and Applications [C]. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  • 8Ungerer, F. & H. J. Schmid. 2009. An Introduction toCognitive Linguistics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • 9van Dijk, T. A. 2008. Discourse and Power [-M&. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 10大卫·麦克里兰.2005.意识形态(孔兆政、蒋龙翔译)[M].长春:吉林人民出版社.

二级参考文献82

共引文献121

同被引文献83

引证文献7

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部