期刊文献+

低管电压联合原始数据迭代重建技术在眼眶CT扫描中的应用 被引量:6

Application of low kilovoltage and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction in orbital CT scan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨第二代双源CT低管电压(100kVp)扫描联合基于原始数据迭代重建(SAFIRE)在眼眶扫描中的应用价值。方法对100例疑似眼眶病变患者行CT扫描,分为100kVp扫描(A)组50例,SAFIRE重建,选择强度3级,120kVp扫描(B)组50例,滤波反投影(FBP)重建;比较两组的辐射剂量及图像的平均CT值、图像噪声、SNR、CNR、图像质量主观评分、诊断效能等。结果 A、B两组辐射剂量比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.59,P=0.01),A组较B组有效辐射剂量降低约33.78%;与B组相比,A组图像噪声降低21.52%;SNR提高22.88%;CNR提高28.88%;且差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。两组图像的主观评分比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.34,P=0.88)。A、B两组CT诊断效能与临床诊断比较差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.08、0.10,P=0.99、0.99)。结论采用第二代双源CT低管电压(100kVp)联合SAFIRE重建技术行眼眶扫描,能保证图像质量,并可降低辐射剂量。 Objective To investigate the application value of second generation dual source CT low kilovoltage(100kVp)and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction(SAFIRE)in orbital scan.Methods Totally 100 cases of orbital lesions suspected patients underwent CT scan,who were divided into group A by 100 kVp scan(SAFIRE,selection strength level 3,n=50),group B by 120 kVp scan(filtered back projection reconstruction,n=50).Mean CT values,image noise,SNR,CNR,subjective scoring and diagnostc efficiency were compared between both groups.Results The radiation dose(ED)difference of group A and B was statistically significant(t=3.59,P=0.01),ED of group A was less than group B approximately 33.78%.Compared with group B,group A for the noise decreased 21.52%,SNR increased 22.88%,CNR increased 28.88%,which had statistical differences(P〈0.05).Subjective scores between the two groups was not statistically significant images(t=0.34,P=0.88).The diagnostic efficacy of A group and B group showed no statistically significant compared with clinical diagnosis(x^2=0.08,0.10,P=0.99,0.99).Conclusion The images received by second generation dual source CT low kilovoltage(100kVp)and SAFIRE-3in orbital scan can meet the diagnostic requirements and significantly reduce the radiation dosage,which did not increase image noise.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期1730-1733,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 眼眶疾病 体层摄影术 X线计算机 图像处理 计算机辅助 辐射剂量 Orbital diseases Tomography X-ray computed Image processing computer-assisted Radiation dosage
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J M, 2007,357(22) :2277-2284.
  • 2侯阳,于兵,郭启勇,王玉科,余美.迭代重建对前置门控冠状动脉CT图像质量及辐射剂量的影响[J].中华放射学杂志,2013,47(4):305-309. 被引量:61
  • 3Schabel C, Fenchel M, Schmidt B, et al. Clinical evaluation and po- tential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomo- graphy angiography. Acad Radiol, 2013,20(2) :165-172.
  • 4Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: Report of AAPM nuclear mag- netic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys, 1990,17 (2):287-295.
  • 5Menzel H, Schibilla H, Teunen D, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg: Europe- an Commission. 2000: 162.
  • 6杨晶,高艳,李坤成,杜祥颖,李岩.比较两种低剂量CT迭代重建法与常规剂量滤波反投影重建法的图像质量[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(1):117-121. 被引量:24
  • 7骆飞,耿建华,邹作伟,洪浩,赵卫强,郑容.重建算法对SPECT空间分辨力的影响[J].中国医学影像技术,2014,30(1):130-135. 被引量:9
  • 8Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoef UJ, et al. Coronary CT avgiography: Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potentialfor radiation dose reduc- tion using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol, 2011,21(10):2130-2138.
  • 9曾宪春,何波,康绍磊,谢晓洁,韩丹.基于原始数据的迭代重建技术在眼眶CT平扫中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2013,29(6):1019-1022. 被引量:4
  • 10Fernandez A, Greffier J, Langard E, et al. Database to CT scan to reduce doses with iterative reconstructions (SAFIRE). Physi- ca Mediea, 2013,29(Suppl 1):el-e46.

二级参考文献75

  • 1Kerl JM, Schoepf UJ, Zweruer PL, et al. Accuracy of coronary artery stenosis detection with CT versus conventional coronary angiography compared with composite findings from both tests as an enhanced reference standard. Eur Radiol,2011,21 : 1895-1903.
  • 2McCollough CH. Re: Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2009,25:647.
  • 3Hou Y, Yue Y, Guo W, et al. Prospectively versus retrospectively ECG-gated 256-slice coronary CT angiography: image quality and radiation dose over expanded heart rates. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012,28 : 153-162.
  • 4Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH. Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation, 2003, 107 : 917-922.
  • 5Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D, et al. Combination of a low- tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (idose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr,2011,35 :480-485.
  • 6Zhang C, Zhang Z, Yan Z, et al. 320-row CT coronary angiography : effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2011, 27: 1059-1068.
  • 7Leipsie J, Labouuty TM, Heilbron B, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2010, 195:649-654.
  • 8Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. AJR Am J Roentgeno1,2010,195:655-660.
  • 9Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, et al. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol,2009,193:764-771.
  • 10Hou Y, Liu X, Xv S, et al. Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2012,199:588-594.

共引文献123

同被引文献50

  • 1Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J M, 2007,357(22) :2277-2284.
  • 2Schabel C, Fenehel M, Schmidt B, et al. Clinical evaluation and po- tential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomo- graphy angiography. Acad Radiol, 2013,20(2):165 172.
  • 3Slavin RG, Spector SL, Bernstein 1L, et al. The diagnosis and management of sinusitis: A practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2005,116(6 Suppl) :S13-S47.
  • 4Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys, 1990, 17(2) : 287-295.
  • 5Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, et al. A three dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. MedPhys, 2007,34(11):4526-4544.
  • 6Moscariello A, Takx RA, Schoepf UJ, et al. Coronary CT angi- ography: Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potentialfor ra- diation dose reduction using a novel iterative imagereconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filteredbaek projection. Eur Radiol, 2011,21 (10) : 2130-2138.
  • 7Marret JL, Feddes AR, Mann L, et al. An overview of the SAFIRE project: A scientific approach to finding indicators and responses to radicalisation. Journal Exit-Deutschland : Zeitschrift far Deradikalisierung und demokratische Kultur, 2013,2(1) : 123-148.
  • 8ALKAD HH, SCHEFFEL H, DESBIOLLES L, et al. Dual source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy [J]. Eur Heart J, 2008,29(6):766-776.
  • 9MENZAL H, SCHIBILLA H, TEUNEN D, et al. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography [ J ]. Lux- embourg : European Co mmission, 2000, 16 ( 3 ) : 62-64.
  • 10PRICE RR, AXEL L, MORGAN T, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance hnaging: Report of AAPM Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Task Group No.1 [J ]. Med Phys, 1990, 17(2) :287- 295.

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部