期刊文献+

图形面积判断任务下信息加工模式和信息呈现方式对吸引效应的影响 被引量:3

The Influence of Information Processing Mode and Information Presentation Pattern on Attraction Effect in Area Comparison Judgments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究使用图形面积判断任务取代典型的双属性决策框架,考察了不同信息加工模式和信息呈现方式对吸引效应的影响。实验1比较了不同信息加工模式对吸引效应的影响,结果发现,当被试以直觉的信息加工方式进行面积比较判断时,吸引效应不显著,而以分析的信息加工方式判断时吸引效应明显存在,后者效应强度显著大于前者。实验2通过调整图形排列顺序,比较了刺激材料呈现方式对吸引效应的影响,结果表明,被试以直觉的信息加工方式进行判断时吸引效应依然存在,但其表现要受信息呈现方式影响,相对于将目标图形放置于诱引图形和竞争图形之间,将诱引图形放置于目标图形和竞争图形之间而成为判断背景时,吸引效应强度更大。研究提出了吸引效应形成的两阶段理论,认为吸引效应产生的根源同时来自直觉的和分析的两个信息加工阶段,研究也证实信息呈现方式对被试信息加工方式造成较大影响,进而影响吸引效应强度。 Attraction effect refers to the phenomenon that the addition of an asymmetrically dominated alternative to a choice set can increase the share of one of the original alternatives. As a form of context effect, it has received considerable empirical scrutiny in the marketing, consumer behavior, employee recruitment and other decision-making literature in recent years. Based on experiments, this paper verifies that the attraction effect still exists in area comparison judgments, and that it is multiply determined by both intuitive processing and analytic processing. Experiment 1 used the aptitude test technique to trigger the information processing pattern(intuitive processing and analytic processing) and explored the effect of information processing on the attraction effect. 252 undergraduate students have participated in experiment 1 and were randomly assigned to the experimental manipulation. Through adjusting the sort order of the figures, experiment 2 explored the effect of the stimulus presentation pattern on the attraction effect. 196 undergraduate students have participated in experiment 2 and were manipulated to three different conditions(core set, context set 1 and context set 2). The results of Experiment 1 reveal that the attraction effect can occur in an area comparison judgment task. The results also demonstrate that the information processing mode affects the attraction effect significantly, and analytic processing leads to a higher attraction effect than intuitive processing does. However, no attraction effect is found under intuitive processing in experiment 1. The results of Experiment 2 show that the attraction effect still exists when participants judge under intuitive processing, but its performance is affected by figures' sort order. Compared to placing the target alternative between the decoys alternative and the competition alternative, putting the decoys alternative in the middle as the judgment background will enhance the attraction effect. The findings of this study offer an explanation for the attraction effect that can be interpreted in terms of general notions of information processing. Specifically, these findings implicate two factors in the attraction effect: information processing and information presentation. We propose a dual information processing theory to classify the mechanisms of the attraction effect and suggest that the attraction effect is rooted in both intuitive processing and analytic processing. The study also verifies that stimulus presentation pattern can affect participants' information processing, which then will influence the attraction effect.
作者 张全成 刘阳
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期1639-1648,共10页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(项目编号:71202166 71002108)
关键词 标准性假设 吸引效应 不对称占优备择项 损失规避 值域-频率效应 normal hypothesis attraction effect asymmetrically dominated alternative loss aversion rangefrequency effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Anastasi, A. (1936). The estimation of area. The Journal of General Psychology, 14(1),201-225.
  • 2Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. S. (1995). Added seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 223-232.
  • 3Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., & Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2),328-339.
  • 4Frederick, S., & Lee, L. (2008). Attraction, repulsion, and attribute representation. Advances in Consumer Research, 35, 122-123.
  • 5Fisher, G. H., & Foster, J. J. (1968). Apparent sizes of different shapes and the facility with which they can be identified. Nature, 219, 653-654.
  • 6Gigerenzer, G., & Richter, H. R. (1990). Context effects and their interaction with development: Area judgments. Cognitive Development, 5(3), 235-264.
  • 7Guadagni, P. M., & Little, J. D. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203-238.
  • 8Ha, Y. W., Park, S., & Ahn, H. Y. (2009). The influence of categorical attributes on choice context effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3),463-477.
  • 9Haber, R. N., & Levin, C. A. (2001). The independence of size perception and distance perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(7), 1140-1152.
  • 10Hahn, M., Won, E., Kang, H., & Hyun, Y. J. (2006). Context effects and context maps for positioning. International Journal of Market Research, 48(2), 155-177.

同被引文献36

  • 1李晓明,傅小兰.决策中的延迟选择行为[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):127-129. 被引量:13
  • 2Thomas,S.G.How regular is regularity?An empirical test of the regularity assumption[J].Advances in Consumer Research,1990,17:398–405.
  • 3Huber,J.,Payne,J.W.,&Puto,C.Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives:Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis[J].Journal of Consumer Research,1982,9:90-98.
  • 4Heath,T.B.,&Chatterjee,S.Asymmetric decoy effects on low-quality versus higher quality brands:Meta-analysis and experimental evidence[J].Journal of Consumer Research,1995,22(3):268-284.
  • 5Doyle,J.R.,O’connor,D.J.,Reynolds,G.M.,&Bottomley,P.A.The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect:Buying frames,phantom alternatives,and in-store purchases[J].Psychology and Marketing,1999,16(3):225-243.
  • 6Wedell,D.H.,&Pettibone,J.C.Using judgment to understand decoy effect in choice[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,67:326-344.
  • 7Mishra,S.,Umesh,U.N.,&Tem,D.E.Antecedents of the attraction effect:An information processing approach[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1993,30:331-349.
  • 8Frederick,S.,&Lee,L.Attraction,repulsion,and attribute representation[J].Advances in Consumer Research,2008,35:122-123.
  • 9Lin,C.H.,Sun Y.C.,Chuang,S.C.,&Su,H.J.Time pressure and the compromise and attraction effects in choice[J].Advances in Consumer Research,2008,25:348-352.
  • 10Dhar,R.,&Glazer,R.Similarity in context:Cognitive representation and violation of preference and perceptual invariance in consumer choice[J].Organiza-tional Behavior&Human Decision Processes,1996,67:280-293.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部