具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向被引量：48

Embodied Morality:A New Approach in Moral Psychology

导出

摘要具身道德是指身体及其活动方式与道德心理和行为的相互作用。迄今为止,具身道德研究主要采用道德Stroop范式、内隐联想测验范式、情境操纵范式和心境诱发范式。具身道德的研究内容主要包括身体解剖学结构、知觉经验及身体与环境的嵌入作用与道德心理及行为的相互作用,且在广泛的知觉经验内容中包涵了身体厌恶与道德的关系、自我洁净—道德纯洁隐喻、道德—明度隐喻、道德—颜色隐喻、道德的空间维度与时间维度等多个内容。未来的研究需从研究内容的丰富性与全面性、隐喻效应的文化差异与一致性效应、研究方法技术的科学性与多样性等几个方面着手。 The embodied morality is that the physical and its activities have an interactive impact with moral psychology and behavior. The research paradigms of embodied morality are including moral Stroop, implicit association test, the paradigm of situation change, and the paradigm of mood change. Embodied morality combines the effects of body anatomy, perception experience and the interaction of body and environment with moral psychology and behavior. In the relationships with perception experience and moral psychology, it includes the relationship between physical disgust and moral, self-cleanness and moral purity metaphor, moral-lightness metaphor, moral-color metaphor, the spatial dimension of moral and the time dimension of moral. Future research should enrich and improve the research contents, study the metaphorical cultural differences and consistency effect, use of various methods and techniques and so on.

作者陈潇江琦侯敏朱梦音

机构地区西南大学心理学部西南大学心理健康教育研究中心

出处《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期664-672,共9页 Psychological Development and Education

基金全国教育科学规划课题"基于积极心理品质培养的中小学生心理健康多维测评系统研究"(EBA120332) 中国人心理素质全国协作组

关键词具身道德具身认知道德心理道德行为 embodied morality embodied cognition moral psychology moral behavior

分类号 B844.3 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献70

1Agerstrom, J. , & Bjorklund, F. (2009). Temporal distance and moral concerns: Future morally questionable behavior is perceived as more w rong and evokes stronger prosoeial intentions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31 ( 1 ) , 49 - 59.
2Agerstrom, J., Bjorklund, F., & Carlsson, R. (2012). Emotions in time: Moral emotions appear more intense with temporal distance. Social Cognition, 30(2) , 181 - 198.
3Banerjee, P. , Chatterjee, P. , & Sinha, J. (2012). Is it light or dark?Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23 (4) , 407 - 409.
4Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., & Boothby, E. J. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16 ( 12 ) , 593 - 605.
5Bobro, M. E. ( 1999). Leibniz on embodiment and the moral order. The Southern journal of philosophy, 37( 3 ) , 377 - 396.
6Brandt M. J., IJzerman H., & Blanken,I. (2014). Does Recalling Moral Behavior Does Recalling Moral Behavior of Brightness? A Replication and Meta-Analysis of Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha ( 2012 ). Social Psychology, 45 ( 3 ), 246 - 252.
7Chapman, H. A. , & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological bulletin, 139(2), 300.
8Chiou, W. -B., & Cheng, Y. -Y. (2013). In broad daylight, we trust in God! Brightness, the salience of morality, and ethical behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 37 - 42.
9Cohon, R. (2010). Hume's moral philosophy. In Edward N. Zalta ( Ed. ) , Tire Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy ( Fall 2010 edition ). Retrieved February 22, 2011, from http://plato, stanford, edu/ archives/fall2010/entries/hume-moral/.
10Damasio, A. (2008). DescartesJerror: Emotion, reason and the human brain: Random House.