期刊文献+

Stochastic model updating using distance discrimination analysis 被引量:5

Stochastic model updating using distance discrimination analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 This manuscript presents a stochastic model updating method, taking both uncertainties in models and variability in testing into account. The updated finite element(FE) models obtained through the proposed technique can aid in the analysis and design of structural systems. The authors developed a stochastic model updating method integrating distance discrimination analysis(DDA) and advanced Monte Carlo(MC) technique to(1) enable more efficient MC by using a response surface model,(2) calibrate parameters with an iterative test-analysis correlation based upon DDA, and(3) utilize and compare different distance functions as correlation metrics. Using DDA, the influence of distance functions on model updating results is analyzed. The proposed stochastic method makes it possible to obtain a precise model updating outcome with acceptable calculation cost. The stochastic method is demonstrated on a helicopter case study updated using both Euclidian and Mahalanobis distance metrics. It is observed that the selected distance function influences the iterative calibration process and thus, the calibration outcome, indicating that an integration of different metrics might yield improved results. This manuscript presents a stochastic model updating method, taking both uncertainties in models and variability in testing into account. The updated finite element(FE) models obtained through the proposed technique can aid in the analysis and design of structural systems. The authors developed a stochastic model updating method integrating distance discrimination analysis(DDA) and advanced Monte Carlo(MC) technique to(1) enable more efficient MC by using a response surface model,(2) calibrate parameters with an iterative test-analysis correlation based upon DDA, and(3) utilize and compare different distance functions as correlation metrics. Using DDA, the influence of distance functions on model updating results is analyzed. The proposed stochastic method makes it possible to obtain a precise model updating outcome with acceptable calculation cost. The stochastic method is demonstrated on a helicopter case study updated using both Euclidian and Mahalanobis distance metrics. It is observed that the selected distance function influences the iterative calibration process and thus, the calibration outcome, indicating that an integration of different metrics might yield improved results.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第5期1188-1198,共11页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10972019) the Innovation Foundation of BUAA for Ph.D. Graduates of China, and the China Scholarship Council
关键词 Distance discrimination analysis Model updating Model validation Monte Carlo simulation Uncertainty Distance discrimination analysis Model updating Model validation Monte Carlo simulation Uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Draper D. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat MethodoI1995;57(l):45-97.
  • 2Jiang XM, Mahadevan S, Urbina A. Bayesian nonlinear structural equation modeling for hierarchical validation of dynamical systems. Mech Syst Signal Proc 2010;24(4):957-75.
  • 3Atamturktur S, Hemez FM, Unal C, Tome C, Williams B. A forecasting metric for predictive modeling. Comput Struct 2011;89(23):2377-87.
  • 4Farajpour I, Atamturktur S. Error and uncertainty analysis of inexact and imprecise computer models. J Comput Civil Eng 2013;27(4):407-18.
  • 5Govers Y, Link M. Stochastic model updating: covariance matrix adjustment from uncertain experimental modal data. Mech Syst Signal Proc 2010;24(3):696-706.
  • 6Khodaparast HH, Mottershead JE, Badcock KJ. Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the Kriging predictor. Mech Syst Signal Proc 2010;25(4):1204--26.
  • 7Chen W, Baghdasaryan L, Buranathiti T, Cao J. Model validation via uncertainty propagation and data transformations. AJAA J 2004;42(7): 1406-15.
  • 8Zang C, Schwingshackl CW, Ewins OJ. Model validation for structural dynamic analysis: an approach to the Sandia structural dynamics challenge. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2008;197(29-32):2645-59.
  • 9Aglietti GS, Walker SJI, Kiley A. On the use of SEREP for satellite FEM validation. Eng Comput 2012;29(6):580-95.
  • 10Calvi A. Uncertainty-based loads analysis for spacecraft: finite element model validation and dynamic responses. Comput Struct 2005;83(14):1103-12.

同被引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部