期刊文献+

Heroin Narratives: Normalisation and Demonisation of Heroin Use at a Swedish Online Message Board

Heroin Narratives: Normalisation and Demonisation of Heroin Use at a Swedish Online Message Board
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Heroin is considered potent and addictive and users are often stigmatised as the other. On the internet, however, hegemonic ideas about drugs can be resisted. This study elucidates how efforts to uormalise and demonise heroin meet at a Swedish online message board (Flashback Forum). The study aims at analysing how heroin use is given meaning by discussants in a thread called "I will start with heroin". The data were perceived and structured as a collaborative, overarching narrative about when, why, and for whom heroin use can make sense. Discussants used stories about pleasure-seekers, miserable junkies, and self-medicating addicts to depict the activity as unproblematic and rational, problematic and irrational, or as problematic and rational. No stories about heroin use departed from the plot-lines of pleasure maximisation and pain minimisation. Results elucidate a discursive battle in which: (1) heroin use as minimisation of pain "wins" over heroin use as maximisation of pleasure; and (2) there is a general agreement that heroin use cannot be irrational and unproblematic at the same time. It is suggested that these features are central to contemporary drug discourse, and that they probably hinder public understanding of why people use heroin and therefore contribute to keep users stigmatised.
作者 Mats Ekendahl
机构地区 Stockholm University
出处 《Sociology Study》 2014年第8期714-727,共14页
关键词 HEROIN INTERNET NARRATIVE CONSTRUCTION qualitative 海洛因 留言板 在线 瑞典 正常化 药物治疗 非理性 最大化
  • 相关文献

参考文献60

  • 1Bamberg, M. 2004. "Considering Counter Narratives." Pp. 351-371 in Considering Counter Narratives: Narrating, Resisting, Making Sense, edited by M. Bamberg and M. Andrews. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 2Barratt, M. J. 2011. Beyond lnternet as a Tool: A Mixed-methods Study of Online Drug Dcussions. Melbourne: National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University.
  • 3Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
  • 4Bell, P. 1985. "Drugs and the Media." Australian AlcoholDrug Review 4:235-242.
  • 5Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality." A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
  • 6Bergmark, A. 2004. "Risk, Pleasure and Information. Notes Concerning the Discursive Space of Alcohol Prevention." Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs (English SupplemenO 21:7-16.
  • 7Blomqvist, J. 2009. "What Is the Worst Thing You Could Get Hooked on? Popular Images of Addiction Problems in Contemporary Sweden." Nordisk Alkohol-och Narkotikatidsskrift 26:373-398.
  • 8Bourgois, P. 2000. "Disciplining Addictions: The Bio-politics of Methadone and Heroin in the United States." Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 24:165-195.
  • 9Bourgois, P. and J. Schonberg. 2009. Righteous Dopefiend. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • 10Bunton, R. and J. Coveney. 2011. "Drugs' Pleasures." Critical Public Health 21:9-23.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部