摘要
目的了解青岛市市、区(县)两级疾病预防控制机构实验室仪器设备配置和检验能力。方法对青岛市市级和区(县)级所有疾病预防控制机构进行问卷调查,对实验室仪器设备、人员状况、实验室面积、开展检验项目等情况进行普查,与卫生部制定的指导标准比较分析。结果青岛市市级和区(县)级所有疾病预防控制机构均存在人员不足、实验室面积不达标、实验室仪器配置不达标并且不同区(县)级疾病预防控制机构达标率存在较大差距的问题。检验能力方面,市级疾病预防控制A类和B类项目开展率分别达到83.20%和61.65%,多数区(县)实验室A类项目开展率超过60%,但B类项目开展率较低;少部分区(县)A类和B类项目开展率均较低。结论青岛市市级和区(县)级疾病预防控制机构实验室仪器设备有较大缺口,检验能力不足,区(县)级疾病预防控制机构实验室仪器设备配置和检验能力方面发展不平衡,与指导标准相比存在较大差距。
Objective To investigate the present condition of laboratory equipment collocation and testing capabilities of CDCs in Qingdao and its dominated counties.Methods A questionnaire survey was made at CDCs in Qingdao city and its dominated counties,and a general survey was made on items including laboratory areas,laboratory equipment,human resources and testing capabilities.The results were compared and analyzed with guiding made standard by ministry of health.Results All CDCs of Qingdao city and counties had problems,such as shortage of staff and laboratory area,and laboratory equipment was not up to guiding standard made by ministry of health,and the gap of laboratory equipment of CDCs in different county levels.About testing capabilities,the rate of A and B type testing items was respectively 83.20% and 61.65% in Qingdao city.The rate of A type testing items were more than 60% in most CDCs in county levels,but the rate of B type testing items were low.The rates of A and B type test items were all low in a few CDCs in county levels.Conclusion There were great gaps in the need of laboratory equipment collocation.And the testing capacity was insufficient.Regional laboratory equipment collocation and testing capacity were of imbalance in counties,which is far more not enough according to the standard guide.
出处
《中国卫生检验杂志》
北大核心
2014年第22期3315-3317,共3页
Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词
疾病预防控制
实验室仪器设备
配置
检验能力
Disease control and prevention
Laboratory equipments
Collocation
Testing capabilities
