期刊文献+

γ-干扰素释放试验对结核病患者临床诊断性能评价研究 被引量:6

Evaluation of clinical diagnostic performance of interferon-gamma release assays for tuberculosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价采用A.TB试剂[酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)]进行结核杆菌特异性γ-干扰素释放试验(interferon-gamma release assays,IGRAs)对结核病的临床诊断性能及应用价值。方法 108例研究对象中,临床明确诊断结核病60例(结核组),非结核病对照者48例(非结核对照组)。同时采用A.TB试剂(ELISA法)和T-SPOT.TB试剂[酶联免疫斑点试验(enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot,ELISPOT)]进行IGRAs。结果 A.TB试剂(ELISA法)检测的灵敏度为86.67%,特异度为85.42%,受试者工作特征曲线(receiver-operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)下面积为0.822,95%可信区间(confidence interval,CI)为0.733~0.912。T-SPOT.TB试剂(ELSPOT法)检测灵敏度为91.67%,特异度为87.50%,ROC曲线下面积为0.884,95%CI为0.806~0.962。ROC曲线下面积差异无统计学意义(χ^20.081,P=0.776)。2种检测方法一致率为87.04%(94/108),Kappa值为0.738。结论 A.TB试剂和T-SPOT.TB试剂检测的整体诊断性能相似,且A.TB试剂检测在操作和检测结果判读方面明显优于T-SPOT.TB试剂。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance and application value of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)-based interferon-gamma release assays(IGRAs) with A.TB kit for patients with tuberculosis. Methods Of 108 patients enrolled in the study, 60 were definitely diagnosed with tuberculosis(tuberculosis group), and 48 were controls(non-tuberculosis group).ELISA-based IGRAs with A.TB kit and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot(ELISPOT)-based IGRAs with T-SPOT.TB kit were carried out simultaneously. Results The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA-based IGRAs with A.TB kit were 86.67% and 85.42%,and the area under a receiver-operating characteristic(ROC) curve was 0.822 [95% confidence interval(CI), 0.733-0.912]. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISPOT-based IGRAs with T-SPOT.TB kit were 91.67% and 87.50%, and the area under ROC curve was 0.884(95% CI, 0.806-0.962). The difference in the area under ROC curve was not significant between the two assays(χ^20.081, P=0.776). The consistency of the two assays was 87.04%(94/108) with the Kappa value of 0.738. Conclusions ELISA-based IGRAs with A.TB kit and ELISPOT-based IGRAs with T-SPOT.TB kit have a similar overall diagnostic performance, but ELISA-based IGRAs with A.TB kit is superior to ELISPOT-based IGRAs with T-SPOT.TB kit in the operation and interpretation of the test results.
出处 《传染病信息》 2014年第5期302-305,共4页 Infectious Disease Information
基金 国家"十二五"科技重大专项(2013ZX09J13106-06A)
关键词 干扰素γ释放试验 结核分枝杆菌 预测 免疫印迹法 指示剂和试剂 interferon-gamma release tests Mycobacterium tuberculosis forecasting immunoblotting indicators and reagents
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Lfinnroth K, Corbett E, Golub J, et a!. Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: rationale, definitions and key considerations [J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2013, 17(3):289-298.
  • 2王永怡,王姝,卢福昱,胡玫,董时军,陈玉琪,李楠,郭子静,张海陵,李军.2013年感染性疾病热点回顾[J].传染病信息,2014,27(1):1-7. 被引量:19
  • 3Behr MA, Wilson MA, Gill WP, et ol. Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by whole-genome DNA microarray[J]. Science, 1999, 284(5419):1520-1523.
  • 4Mazurek GH, Jereb J, Lobue P, et all. Guidelines for using theQuantiFERON-TB Gold test for detecting Mycobacterium tubercu- losis infection, United States[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2005, 54 (RR-15):49-55.
  • 5Lalvani A.Diagnosing tuberculosis infection in the 21st century:new tools to tackle an old enemy[J ]. Chest, 2007, 131(6): 1898-1906.
  • 6Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A. Evidence-based comparison of commercial interferon-gamma release assays for detecting active TB: a meta analysis[J]. Chest, 2010, 137(4):952-968.
  • 7郑建洲,王亚楠,俞小卫.两种γ-干扰素释放试验诊断结核病的性能比较[J].临床检验杂志,2013,31(7):556-557. 被引量:17
  • 8Connell TG, Ritz N, Paxton GA, eta/. A three-way comparison of tuberculin skin testing, QuantiFERON-TB gold and T-SPOT.TB in children[J]. PLOS One, 2008, 3(7):e2624.

二级参考文献54

  • 1Pai M, Riley LW, Colford JM. Interferon-',/assays in the immunodi- agnosis of tuberculosis : a systematic review [ J 1. Lancet Infect Dis, 2004, 4(12) :761-776.
  • 2Menzies D, Pai M, Comstock G. Meta-analysis: new tests for the di- agnosis of latent tuberculosis infection : areas of uncertainty and rec- ommendations for research [ J ]. Ann Intern Med, 2007, 146 (5) :340.
  • 3Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D. Systematic review: T-cell-based as- says for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection : an update [ J 1. Ann Intern Med, 2008, 149 (3) : 177.
  • 4Kik SV, Franken WP, Mensen M, et al. Predictive value for pro- gression to tuberculosis by IGRA and TST in immigrant contacts[ J]. Eur Respir J, 2010, 35(6) :1346-1353.
  • 5Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhans A. Evidence-based comparison of commercial interferon-'y release assays for detecting active TB:a metaanalysis[J]. Chest, 2010, 137(4) :952-968.
  • 6Detjen AK, Keil T, Roll S, et al. Interferon-gamma release assays improve the diagnosis of tuberculosis and nontuberculous myeobaete- rial disease in children in a country with a low incidence of tuberculo- sisIJl. Clin Infect Dis, 2007, 45(3): 322-328.
  • 7中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 2013年度全国法定传染病疫情情况[EB/OL]. [2014-02-13]. http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/jkj/s3578/201402/26700e8a83c04205913a106545069a11.shtml.
  • 8健康报网. 英国麻疹暴发祸起“疫苗抵制”[EB/OL]. [2014-01-20]. http://www.jkb.com.cn/htmlpage/36/366202.htm?docid=366202&cat=09C&sKeyWord=null.
  • 9Payne DC, Vinjé J, Szilagyi PG, et al. Norovirus and medically attended gastroenteritis in U.S. children[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(12):1121-1130.
  • 10新华网. 诺如病毒新毒株在美传播[EB/OL]. [2014-1-20]. http://news.xinhuanet.com/tech/2013-01/26/c_114509388.htm.

共引文献34

同被引文献59

  • 1Pai M, Kalantri S, Dheda K. New tools and emerging technologiesfor the diagnosis of tuberculosis : Part I. Latent tuberculosis [ J ]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2006,6 ( 3 ) :413 - 422.
  • 2Lalvani A,Pareek M. A 100 year update on diagnosis of tuberculo- sis infection[J]. Br Med Bull,2010,93:69 - 84.
  • 3Diel R, Goletti D, Ferrara G, et al. Interferon-'y release assays for the diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection : a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis[ J]. Eur Respir J,2011,37 ( 1 ) : 88 - 99.
  • 4Tan T, Lee WL, Alexander DC, et al. The ESAT-6/CFP-10 secre- tion system of mycobactefium marinum modulates phagnosome mat- uration [ J ]. Cell Microbio1,2006 ,8 (9) : 1417 - 1429.
  • 5Aagaard CS, Hoang Tr, Vingsbo-Lundberg C, et al. Quality and vaccine efficacy of CD4+ T cell responses directed to dominant and subdominant epitopes in ESAT-6 from mycobacterium tuberculosis [J]. J Immuno1,2009,183 (4) :2659 - 2668.
  • 6Sester M, Sotgiu G, Lange C, et al. Interferon-/ release assays for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis : a systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. Eur Respir J,2011,37 ( 1 ) : 100 - 111.
  • 7Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A. Evidence-based comparison of commercial interferon-gamma release assays for detecting active TB : a metaanalysis [ J]. Chest,2010,137 (4) :952 - 968.
  • 8Song Q, Guo H, Zhong H, et al. Evaluation of a new interferon-gam- ma release assay and comparison to tuberculin skin test during a tuberculosis outbreak[ J]. Int J Infect Dis, 2012,16 ( 7 ) : e522 - e526.
  • 9Wei Z, Yang M, Quan B, et al. Prevalence of latent tuberculosis in- fection among healtheare workers in China as detected by two inter- feron-gamma release assays [ J ]. J Hosp Infect, 2013,84 ( 4 ) : 323 - 325.
  • 10World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2014 [ R/ OL]. Geneva: WHO, 2014 ( 2014-10-22 ) [ 2015-3-25 ]. http:// who. int/tb/publieations/global--report/en/.

引证文献6

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部