期刊文献+

Capecitabine maintenance therapy for XT chemotherapy-sensitive patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer 被引量:8

Capecitabine maintenance therapy for XT chemotherapy-sensitive patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy(MT) after initial capecitabine plus docetaxel(XT) chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer(m TNBC).Methods: Fifty-five m TNBC patients treated with XT chemotherapy between May 2007 and June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. When initial disease control was achieved by the combination chemotherapy, capecitabine was continued for 32 patients(MT), while 23 patients remained without any treatment(nonMT). We compared progression-free survival(PFS) and safety of both groups.Results: The median PFS of 55 patients was 8.1 months, overall median PFS time of 32 patients in the capecitabine MT group and 23 in the non-MT group was 10.1 vs. 6.7 months(P=0.032), respectively. When compared PFS time of maintenance treatment, single-agent capecitabine prolonged PFS by 7.1 months, for non-MT patients, the PFS without any treatment was 3.1 months, and this between-group difference was statistically significant(P=0.003). Adverse events, including of hematologic toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicities, hand-foot syndrome and abnormal liver function were not significantly different between two groups.Conclusions: After initial disease control was achieved with the XT combination chemotherapy, capecitabine MT can significantly prolong PFS time with a favorable safety profile in m TNBC patients. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy(MT) after initial capecitabine plus docetaxel(XT) chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer(m TNBC).Methods: Fifty-five m TNBC patients treated with XT chemotherapy between May 2007 and June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. When initial disease control was achieved by the combination chemotherapy, capecitabine was continued for 32 patients(MT), while 23 patients remained without any treatment(nonMT). We compared progression-free survival(PFS) and safety of both groups.Results: The median PFS of 55 patients was 8.1 months, overall median PFS time of 32 patients in the capecitabine MT group and 23 in the non-MT group was 10.1 vs. 6.7 months(P=0.032), respectively. When compared PFS time of maintenance treatment, single-agent capecitabine prolonged PFS by 7.1 months, for non-MT patients, the PFS without any treatment was 3.1 months, and this between-group difference was statistically significant(P=0.003). Adverse events, including of hematologic toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicities, hand-foot syndrome and abnormal liver function were not significantly different between two groups.Conclusions: After initial disease control was achieved with the XT combination chemotherapy, capecitabine MT can significantly prolong PFS time with a favorable safety profile in m TNBC patients.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第5期550-557,共8页 中国癌症研究(英文版)
关键词 CAPECITABINE maintenance therapy(MT) TRIPLE-NEGATIVE metastatic breast cancer(MBC) Capecitabine maintenance therapy(MT) triple-negative metastatic breast cancer(MBC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Perou CM.Molecular stratification of triple-negative breast cancers.Oncologist 2010;15 Suppl 5:39-48.
  • 2Perou CM,Sφrlie T,Eisen MB,et al.Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.Nature 2000;406:747-52.
  • 3Sotiriou C,Neo SY,McShane LM,et al.Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study.Proc Nad Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:10393-8.
  • 4Bidard FC,Conforti R,Boulet T,et al.Does triplenegative phenotype accurately identify basal-like tumour?An immunohistochemical analysis based on 143 ‘triplenegative’ breast cancers.Ann Oncol 2007; 18:1285-6.
  • 5Nielsen TO,Hsu FD,Jensen K,et al.Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5367-74.
  • 6Cheang MC,Voduc D,Bajdik C,et al.Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype.Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:1368-76.
  • 7Bauer KR,Brown M,Cress RD,et al.Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative,progesterone receptor (PR)-negative,and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer,the so-called triple-negative phenotype:a populationbased study from the California cancer Registry.Cancer 2007;109:1721-8.
  • 8André F,Zielinski CC.Optimal strategies for the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with currently approved agents.Ann Oncol 2012 ;23 Suppl 6:vi46-51.
  • 9Coughlin SS,Ekwueme DU.Breast cancer as a global health concern.Cancer Epidemiol 2009; 33:315-8.
  • 10Ismail-Khan R,Bui MM.A review of triple-negative breast cancer.Cancer Control 2010; 17:173-6.

同被引文献43

引证文献8

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部