摘要
中国(内地)城市摊贩监管行动缘何稳定于"模糊性治理"?在理论层面,这个研究问题关乎政策行动或政府行为模式选择的机会、内容与新的选择机会三个紧密相关的问题。依据"新多源流模型",政策行动选择受到"议题流"、"行动流"和"规则流"等三种政策溪流(即"变量集装箱")的"流向"、"流量"和"水质"等变数的塑造和制约。政策溪流之间的离散或汇聚乃是一连串因果机制相互作用(即"机制串联")的结果。当政策溪流汇流之时,政策行动选择(或变迁)的机会之窗开启。特定政策行动或政府行为模式的选定及其稳定,需从政策语境、政策溪流、政策行动的属性(譬如模糊性治理的功能或政策效应)、决策者的意向性以及相关机制串联过程的交互作用中进行解释。换言之,为了深刻解释这种独特的政策选择现象与政策稳定现象,有必要综合运用机制性解释与功能性解释。前者着力于变量和因果机制的角度;后者则着力于政策行动或政府行为模式(即"模糊性治理")所具功能的角度。考虑到行文,本项研究重点进行机制性解释。
Theoretically, this question is concerned about the opportunity, content and the new opportunity of the policy action choicer. According to 'New Multiple Streams Model(NMSM)', the chosen of policy action within the practice of the regulation of street vending has strongly influenced by the direction, stream discharge and the clarity of three policy streams(including issue stream; rule stream; and action stream). To a great extent, the policy window will become open as long as the confluence of the three policy streams emerging, inducing by the interaction of a series of causal mechanisms. To explain why some kind of policy action has been chosen and became steady-going, researcher should sturdy the interaction between the policy contexts, policy streams, The attribute of certain policy action, the intend of the power elites, and the relatedMechanism in series. In other words, it is not only necessary to make use of the methodology of mechanism-based explanation, but alsousing the traditional functional explanation to give a sound explanation for this policyphenomenon. However, for the sake of simplicity, we will focus on the former.
出处
《甘肃行政学院学报》
CSSCI
2014年第5期28-43,11,共17页
Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
基金
国家社科基金项目资助(项目批准号:14CZZ040)
