摘要
目的 探讨PDCA品管圈护理与常规传统输液护理的临床效果.方法 将300例外伤经清创缝合后需头孢呋辛输液治疗的患者随机分为两组,研究组实施PDCA品管圈输液护理干预,对照组予以常规传统输液护理干预,比较两组患者的输液护理质量和满意度.结果 干预后研究组一针见血率、无痛和无肿胀输液率、患者配合度和输液顺利完成率等护理质量指标均显著高于对照组（P＜0.05或0.01）,对等候时间、输液技术、护患配合程度和输液效果的满意度均显著高于对照组（P＜0.05或0.01）.结论 PDCA品管圈护理干预能显著提高输液患者的护理质量及满意度,有利于融洽护患关系、促进患者的康复.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of the PDCA of quality control cycle （QCC） nursing and routine traditional transfusion nursing. Methods A total of 300 trauma patients who needed cefuroxime transfusion after debridement and suture were randomly assigned to two groups, research group received PDCA cycle transfusion nursing, control group did routine traditional transfusion nursing, and transfusion nursing quality and satisfaction were compared between 2 groups. Results After intervention such nursing quality indexes as one-time puncture rate, painless and non-swelling infusion rate, patients＇ cooperation were all significantly higher （P〈0.05 or 0.01） and so was satisfaction to waiting time, infusion skill, nurse-patient combination and infusion effect （P〈0.05 or 0.01） in research than control group. Conclusion The PDCA of QCC nursing intervention could notably improve nursing quality and satisfaction of patients receiving infusion and is beneficial to harmonious nurse-patient rapport and patients＇ rehabilitation.
出处
《临床心身疾病杂志》
CAS
2014年第6期131-133,共3页
Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
基金
2012年汕头市医疗重点科技计划项目（编号2012-113）
