期刊文献+

基于地震损失估计概率模型的地震保险费及费率厘定 被引量:1

Earthquake premium and premium rate pricing based on probabilistic model of earthquake loss estimation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地震灾害给我国各类建筑物造成了十分严重的破坏,产生了巨额损失。以往我国地震灾害的补偿资金多由政府提供,覆盖面小且效率不高,因此研究如何合理厘定地震保险费和费率可以为我国尽早推进地震保险提供理论基础,极具现实意义。本文在充分研究各个成熟地震损失估计概率模型的基础上,提出了地震纯保费、经济保费、技术保费、毛保费和相应费率的计算方法。同时,考虑免赔额和赔偿限额、再保险和巨灾债券、资金的时间价值和保单理赔数据的反馈等影响因素,对保费和费率进行合理的调整。其中结合具体算例对免赔额和赔偿限额、资金时间价值的影响进行了定量分析,得出免赔额越大、赔偿限额越小、反映资金时间价值的贴现率越大时对保费和费率的影响越大。 Earthquakes caused serious damage and huge losses to our country's structures. In the relief and reconstruction of previous earthquake disasters,the compensation funds were mainly provided by the government,which were not so effective. Thus,pricing earthquake premium and premium rate reasonably is of great practical significance and can provide sound theoretical support of advancing earthquake insurance in our country. A reasonable way of pricing premium and premium rate is proposed on the basis of fully studying the outcomes of several sophisticated probabilistic models of earthquake loss estimation. Effect factors such as deductibles and indemnity limits and reinsurance and catastrophe bonds,and time value of capital and feedback data of insurance policies are considered to adjust the premium and premium rate. Meanwhile,quantitative analysis of deductibles and indemnity limits,time value of capital is conducted with a real example. It is concluded that the impact becomes greater when the deductible and the discount rate are larger,and the indemnity limit is smaller.
作者 王冬 欧进萍
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第5期66-74,共9页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51261120376 91315301-12)
关键词 地震损失估计概率模型 保险 费率 免赔额 赔偿限额 资金时间价值 probabilistic model of earthquake loss estimation insurance premium rate deductible indemnity limit time value of capital
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Dong W, Shah H, Wong F. A rational approach to pricing of catastrophe insurance [ J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1996, 12 (2 -3 ) : 201 -218.
  • 2Nordenson G, Deodatis G, Tantala M, et al. Earthquake loss estimation for the New York City area[J]. NYCEM first year technical report, 2000.
  • 3Tantala M W, Nordenson G J P, Deodatis G, et al. Earthquake loss estimation for the New York City metropolitan region[ J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 28 (10): 812- 835.
  • 4Smolka A. Natural disasters and the challenge of extreme events: risk management from an insurance perspective [ J ]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2006, 364(1845) : 2147 -2165.
  • 5Risk Management Solutions, Inc. Catastrophe Modeling And California Earthquake Risk: A 20-Year Perspective[ EB/OL]. (2009). https://sup- port. rms. com/publieations/LomaPrieta_20Years, pdf.
  • 6TheCIMNE (Centro Internacional de M6todos Numoricos en Ingenieria), EAI, INGEN1AR and ITEC. Probabilistic Modeling of Natural Risks at the Global Level: Global Risk Model[ EB/OL]. (2013 -03 ). http://www, preventionweb, net/english/hyogo/gar/2013/en/home/documents. html.
  • 7陈保华,叶民权.地震保险费率厘定和保险理赔设计的研究[J].地震科技情报,1998(4):1-7. 被引量:7
  • 8巫孟还,邹其嘉.震灾保险的一种实用技术途径及其实施保障[J].自然灾害学报,1992,1(3):17-24. 被引量:9
  • 9邬亲敏,冯启民,莫善军.建筑物地震损失风险与保险费用的确定方法[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(1):180-185. 被引量:22
  • 10陶正如,陶夏新.基于工程地震风险评估的地震保险费率厘定[J].自然灾害学报,2004,13(2):112-118. 被引量:13

二级参考文献52

共引文献61

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部