基于科学的创新与基于技术的创新——兼论科学-技术关系的“部门”模式被引量：20

Science-based innovation and technology-based innovation:sectoral patterns of science-technology relationship

导出

摘要现代以来,科学已经不再是单纯的知识追求,科学发现往往也是新技术。这一类基于科学的创新,与过去得到很多研究的基于技术的创新,存在很大的差异。认识这两类基本的创新模式的差异,对于理解各行业的技术变化和经济发展具有重要意义。因此,这篇文章提出了一个理论框架来分析这些差异。这种框架将使理论与政策讨论能够引进行业差异的视角。此外,这篇文章中的分析说明,科学-技术关系并不存在普遍的模式,而不如被理解为存在着部门模式,在不同的部门中,科学与技术存在不同的关系。 In modern age, science is no more pure pursuit of knowledge. Scientific discoveries are always technological inventions at the same time. This kind of science - based innovation are very different from technology - based innovation, which have been studied quite thoroughly in the past. The recognition of these differences are important for the understanding of economic development and in- dustrial technical change. For the analysis of these differences, this article sets up a theoretical framework, through which the dimen- sion of sectoral differences can be brought into discussions in theories and policies. Moreover, the analysis in this article suggest that there is not a general pattern of science - technology relation, but sectoral patterns.

作者林苞雷家骕

机构地区清华大学中国企业成长与经济安全研究中心

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期1289-1296,共8页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家社科基金重点项目(12AZD061)

关键词基于科学的创新基于技术的创新科学-技术关系 science - based innovation technology - based innovation science - technology relationship

分类号 G301 [文化科学] F403.6 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献47

1Lundvall B.Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction[M].Aalborg;Aalborg University Press,1985.
2Schmookler J.Invention and Economic Growth[M].Cambridge;Harvard University Press,1966.
3莫基尔.雅典娜的礼物:知识经济的历史起源[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
4Dosi G,Nelson R.Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary Processes[A].Hall B H,Rossenberg N.Handbook of the Economics of Innovation[C].Amsterdam:Elsevier,2010.1.
5Barnes B.The science-technology relationship:A model and a query[J].Social studies of science,1982,12(1);166-172.
6Levin R C.Appropriability,R&D spending,and technological performance[J].American Economic Review,1988,78(2):424-428.
7Rip A.Science and technology as dancing partners[A].Kroes P,Bakker M.Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age[C].Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1992.
8波普尔,傅季重等译.猜想与反驳:科学知识的增长[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2005.
9David P.Clio and the economics of QWERTY[J].American Economic Review,1985,75(2).
10Dosi G.Technological paradigms and technological trajectories;A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change[J].Research Policy,1982,11(3):147-162.

二级参考文献52

1李醒民.科学和技术异同论[J].自然辩证法通讯,2007,29(1):1-9. 被引量：35
2D·E·司托克斯.基础科学与技术创新:巴斯德象限[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.62-63.
3Otto Mayr. The Science--Technology Relationship as an Historiographic Problem[J]. Technology and Culture, 1976,17(4) :663- 671.
4Peter Weingart. The relation Between Science and Technology: A Sociological explanation[A]. In Wolfgang Krohn, Edwin T. Layton,JR. , Peter Weingart,eds. The Dynamics of Science and Technology:Social Values, Technical Norms and Scientific Criteria in the Development of Knowledge[C]. Dordreeht, Holland/Boston, U. S. A: D. Reidel Publishing Company,1978.
5Ronald Kline. Construing "Technology" as "Applied Science": Public Rhetoric of Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 1880- 1945[J]. Isis,1995,86(2) : 194-221.
6Paul L. Gardner. The Representation of Science--Technology Relationships in Canadian Physics Textbooks[J]. International Jour- nal of Science Education, 1999,21(3) : 329- 347.
7D.E.司托克斯.基础科学与技术创新--巴斯德象限[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
8John M. Staudenmaier, S. J. Technology's Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: The Society for the History of Technology and The MIT Press, 1984.
9马里奥·邦格.作为应用科学的技术[A].邹珊刚.技术与技术哲学[c].北京:知识出版社,1987.47-69.
10Peter Kroes, Martijn Bakker. Introduction: Technologyical Development and Science[A]. In Peter Kroes, Martijn Bakker, eds. Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age: New Perspectives on the Science--Technology Relationship[C]. Dor- drecht/ Boston/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1992.1-15.