中国生产性服务业空间集聚特征与模式研究——基于地级市的实证分析被引量：44

Spatial Cluster Characteristics and Modes of Producer Services in China

导出

摘要 2000年以后,中国生产性服务业高速发展,产业格局逐渐形成。利用2000年、2005年和2010年3个年份地级市行业从业人员的数据,通过区位基尼系数和空间自相关性分析,发现中国生产性服务业在地理空间中整体呈现点状集中的模式,进而对不同行业的集聚特点进行比较分析,认为信息服务业和商务服务业是首位城市集聚模式,科研技术服务业和房地产业是位序规模分布的模式,金融业则是均衡分布的模式。最后,结合主要城市行业的相对优势度分析,得出随着从业人员的增加,承担的生产性服务功能更加综合,符合中心地理论的特点,在省域和城市群内各城市具有较好的职能分工和互补性。 In the past decade, rapid output growth and employment in the producer services of China have inter- ested the academic sphere in spatial cluster and elaboration of locational theory concerning producer services＇ activities. The article examines spatial clusters and location characteristics of producer services in the Chinese urban system in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010. This study indicates that the location of cities of a large num- ber of employments of service sectors is dispersed in China, comparing to geographical concentration of cities of developed manufacturing industry. Most of producer services experienced a spatially-centralization process in the period 2000-2010. However, there are different cluster modes in various service sectors. According to characteristics of industry agglomeration, these industries are classified into three modes, namely Primate City cluster mode, Rank-Sizb distribution mode and Balanced distribution mode. Primate City cluster mode means the largest city of industry have overwhelming employment scales, cluster characteristics of information ser- vice industry and business service industry. The number of employment of technology and science service in- dustry as well as real estate in the largest cities is slightly more than other classes of cities. Thus these two in- dustries are classified as Rank-Size distribution mode. Although the number of employment of finance and in- surance service has increased in the first class cities, the largest city has no advantage of urban system and the number of employ is relatively balanced in urban system. Therefore, this industry is categorized as Balanced distribution mode. Moreover, the analysis of location quotient and scale of employment evidences there is posi- tive correlation between amount of employment and the number of superiority functions. This means that distri- bution of producer services in China is in accordance with central place theory. Finally, the study also shows there are complementarities and division of labor among of cities in the same provinces and developed metro- politan regions.

作者李佳洺孙铁山张文忠

机构地区中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室中国科学院大学北京大学政府管理学院

出处《地理科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期385-393,共9页 Scientia Geographica Sinica

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目(41230632) 国家社科基金重大项目(10zd&022)资助

关键词生产性服务业空间集聚模式产业格局职能分工 producer services the modes of spatial cluster industrial pattern the division of labor

分类号 F719 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献37

1Coffey W. The geographies of producer services [J]. Urban Ge- ography, 2000, 21(2):17-183.
2Sassen S. The Global city: New York, London, Tokyo [M]. Princeton. N J: Princeton University Press, 1991.
3Kirn T J. Growth and change in the service sector of the US: A spatial perspective [J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1987, 77(3): 353-72.
4Forstall R L, Greene R P. Defining job concentrations: the Los Angeles case[J]. Urban Geography, 1997, 18(8): 705-739.
5Bryson J R, Daniels P W. Service industries in the global econo- my [M]. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar 1998.
6Illeris S. The Service economy: A geographical approach [M]. Chichester, UK: Wiley 1996.
7Gilmer R w. Identifying service-sector exports from major Tex- as cities [J]. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dal- las, 1990, July: 1-16.
8Drennan P. Gateway cities: The metropolitan sources of US pro- ducer-service exports [J]. Urban Studies, 1992, 29(2): 217-35.
9Wood, P. Urban development and knowledge intensive business services: too many unanswered questions?[J]. Growth & Change, 2006, 37(3): 335-361.
10Lindahl D P, Beyers W B. The creation of competitive advan- tage by producer service establishments[J]. Economic Geogra- phy, 1999, 75(1):1-20.