期刊文献+

Workflow to numerically reproduce laboratory ultrasonic datasets

Workflow to numerically reproduce laboratory ultrasonic datasets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The risks and uncertainties related to the storage of high-level radioactive waste (HLRW) can be reducedthanks to focused studies and investigations. HLRWs are going to be placed in deep geological repositories,enveloped in an engineered bentonite barrier, whose physical conditions are subjected tochange throughout the lifespan of the infrastructure. Seismic tomography can be employed to monitor itsphysical state and integrity. The design of the seismic monitoring system can be optimized via conductingand analyzing numerical simulations of wave propagation in representative repository geometry.However, the quality of the numerical results relies on their initial calibration. The main aim of this paperis to provide a workflow to calibrate numerical tools employing laboratory ultrasonic datasets. The finitedifference code SOFI2D was employed to model ultrasonic waves propagating through a laboratorysample. Specifically, the input velocity model was calibrated to achieve a best match between experimentaland numerical ultrasonic traces. Likely due to the imperfections of the contact surfaces, theresultant velocities of P- and S-wave propagation tend to be noticeably lower than those a prioriassigned. Then, the calibrated model was employed to estimate the attenuation in a montmorillonitesample. The obtained low quality factors (Q) suggest that pronounced inelastic behavior of the clay has tobe taken into account in geophysical modeling and analysis. Consequently, this contribution should beconsidered as a first step towards the creation of a numerical tool to evaluate wave propagation innuclear waste repositories. 2014 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting byElsevier B.V. All rights reserved. The risks and uncertainties related to the storage of high-level radioactive waste (HLRW) can be reducedthanks to focused studies and investigations. HLRWs are going to be placed in deep geological repositories,enveloped in an engineered bentonite barrier, whose physical conditions are subjected tochange throughout the lifespan of the infrastructure. Seismic tomography can be employed to monitor itsphysical state and integrity. The design of the seismic monitoring system can be optimized via conductingand analyzing numerical simulations of wave propagation in representative repository geometry.However, the quality of the numerical results relies on their initial calibration. The main aim of this paperis to provide a workflow to calibrate numerical tools employing laboratory ultrasonic datasets. The finitedifference code SOFI2D was employed to model ultrasonic waves propagating through a laboratorysample. Specifically, the input velocity model was calibrated to achieve a best match between experimentaland numerical ultrasonic traces. Likely due to the imperfections of the contact surfaces, theresultant velocities of P- and S-wave propagation tend to be noticeably lower than those a prioriassigned. Then, the calibrated model was employed to estimate the attenuation in a montmorillonitesample. The obtained low quality factors (Q) suggest that pronounced inelastic behavior of the clay has tobe taken into account in geophysical modeling and analysis. Consequently, this contribution should beconsidered as a first step towards the creation of a numerical tool to evaluate wave propagation innuclear waste repositories. 2014 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting byElsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
出处 《Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering》 SCIE CSCD 2014年第6期582-590,共9页 岩石力学与岩土工程学报(英文版)
关键词 Numerical methods Calibration Velocity model Bentonite Viscoelastic wave propagation Numerical methods Calibration Velocity model Bentonite Viscoelastic wave propagation
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Alexander W, McKinley L. Deep geological disposal of radioactive waste (radioactivityin the environment). Rotterdam: Elsevier; 2007.
  • 2Alford RM, Kelly KR, Boore D. Accuracy of finite-difference modeling of the acousticwave equation. Geophysics 1974;39(6):834-42.
  • 3Alonso EE, Springman SM, Ng CWW. Monitoring large-scale tests for nuclear wastedisposal. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2008;26(6):817-26.
  • 4Astbury NF, Moore F. Torsional hysteresis in plastic clay. Rheologica Acta 1970;9(1):124-9.
  • 5Auerkari P. Mechanical and physical properties of engineering alumina ceramics.Espoo, Finland: VTT Manufacturing Technology; 1996.
  • 6Barton N. Rock quality, seismic velocity, attenuation and anisotropy. 1st ed. NewYork: CRC Press; 2006.
  • 7Birch F. The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars: 1. Journal ofGeophysical Research 1960;65(4):1083-102.
  • 8Bohlen T. Parallel 3-D viscoelastic finite-difference seismic modeling. Computersand Geosciences 2002;28:887-99.
  • 9Boyer HE, Gall TL. Metals handbook: desk edition. Ohio: Asm. Intl. Metals Park;1984.
  • 10Chapman N, McCombie C. Principles and standards for the disposal of long-livedradioactive wastes. Rotterdam: Elsevier; 2003.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部