期刊文献+

2013年北京协和医院细菌耐药性监测 被引量:8

Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Peking Union Medical College Hospital 2013
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解北京协和医院2013年临床分离细菌对抗菌药物的耐药性。方法收集2013年1月1日至12月31日北京协和医院临床分离的7236株非重复细菌,采用纸片扩散法或自动化仪器法进行药敏试验,按美国临床实验室标准化协会2013年版标准判读药敏结果,采用WHONET 5.6软件进行数据分析。结果 7236株非重复的细菌中,革兰阴性菌占71.1%(5147株),革兰阳性菌占28.9%(2089株)。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(methicillin-resistant Staphalococcus aureus,MRSA)和耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus,MRCNS)的检出率分别为34.9%(244/700)和67.2%(123/183)。未发现对万古霉素、替考拉宁和利奈唑胺耐药的葡萄球菌。发现少数万古霉素和替考拉宁耐药的屎肠球菌,未发现对利奈唑胺耐药的肠球菌。产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(extended spectrumβ-lactamases,ESBLs)的大肠埃希菌、克雷伯菌属细菌(肺炎克雷伯菌和产酸克雷伯菌)和奇异变形杆菌的检出率分别为49.5%(698/1410)、25.4%(235/925)和22.6%(30/133)。肠杆菌科细菌对碳青霉烯类抗菌药物仍高度敏感,总耐药率1.5%-2.3%。铜绿假单胞菌对亚胺培南和美罗培南的耐药率分别为19.4%和15.6%。鲍曼不动杆菌对上述两种抗菌药物的耐药率分别为70.9%和72.0%。泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌的检出率为42.9%(306/714)。结论细菌耐药性仍是临床重要问题,特别是泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌,应采取有效的医院感染控制措施和合理使用抗菌药物。 Objective To investigate the antimicrobial resistance of bacteria isolated from clinical samples in Peking Union Medical College Hospital in 2013. Methods A total of 7236 nonduplicate clinical isolates were collected from January 1 to December 31 , 2013. Disk diffusion test (Kirby-Bauer method) and automated systems were employed to test the antimicrobial resistance of these isolates. The data were analyzed using WHONET 5.6 software and judged according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline 2013. Results Of the 7236 nonduplicate clinical isolates, Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria accounted for 71.1% (5147) and 28.9% (2089) , respectively. Methicillin-resistant Staphalococcus aureus (MRSA) accounted for 34. 9% (244/700) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MRCNS) accounted for 67.2% (123/ 183 ) of Staphalococcus aureus isolates. No staphylococcus strains resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin, or linezol id were detected. A few strains of Enterococcus faecium were found resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin. No linezolid-resistant enterococcus strains were found. Extended spectrum 13-1actamases (ESBLs)-producing strains accounted for 49.5% (698/1410), 25.4% (235/925) and 22. 6% (30/133) in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species (K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca) and Proteus mirabilis, respectively. The Enterobacteriaeeae strains were still highly sensitive to carbapenems, with only 1.5% -2. 3% resistant to carbapenems. The resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem and meropenem were 19.4% and 15.6% , respeetively. The resistance rates of Acinetobaeter baumannii to these two antimicrobials were 70.9% and 72.0% , respectively. The prevalence of pan-resistant strains in Acinetobacter baumannii was 42.9% (306/714). Conclusions Antimierobial resistanee is still a serious problem, espeeially pan-resistant Aeinetobaeter baumannii strains. It is mandatory to take effective measures controlling nosocomial infection and ensuring rational antimicrobial use.
出处 《协和医学杂志》 2014年第4期422-428,共7页 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
关键词 细菌耐药性监测 抗菌药 泛耐药菌 药敏试验 antimicrobial resistance surveillance antimicrobial agents pan-resistant bacteria antimicrobial susceptibility test
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance stand- ards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. M100-S23 [ S ]. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2013.
  • 2张小江,张辉,窦红涛,朱任媛,谢秀丽,王澎,赵颖,宋红梅,王贺,王瑶,杨启文,孙宏莉,陈雨,徐英春.2012年北京协和医院细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2014,14(2):104-111. 被引量:25
  • 3Nordmann P, Dortet L, Poirel L. Carbepenem resistance in Enterobacteriaeeae: here is the storm! [ J]. Trends Mol Med, 2012, 18: 263-272.
  • 4Limbago BM, Rasheed JK, Anderson KF, et al. IMP-produ- cing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia in the United States [J]. J Clin Mierobiol, 2011, 49: 4239-4245.
  • 5Neuner EA, Sekeres J, Hall GS, et al. Experience with fos- fomyein for treatment of urinary tract infections due to multi- drug-resistant organisms [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemoth- er, 2012, 56: 5744-5748.
  • 6张辉,张小江,徐英春,杨青,汪复,朱德妹,倪语星,孙景勇,孙自镛,简翠,胡云建,艾效曼,张泓,李万华,贾蓓,黄文祥,王传清,薛建昌,魏莲花,吴玲,卓超,苏丹虹,张朝霞,季萍,徐元宏,沈继录,单斌,杜艳,俞云松,林洁.2011年中国CHINET不动杆菌属细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2013,13(5):342-348. 被引量:94
  • 7范欣,肖盟,杨启文,窦红涛,郭莉娜,王贺,原英,王澎,赵颖,张琪,肖永红,徐英春.全国27所医院多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌及铜绿假单胞菌对12种抗菌药物的敏感性[J].协和医学杂志,2014,5(3):253-258. 被引量:3

二级参考文献32

  • 1张小江,徐英春,俞云松,杨青,汪复,朱德妹,倪语星,孙景勇,孙自镛,简翠,胡云建,艾效曼,张泓,李万华,贾蓓,黄文祥,王传清,王爱敏,魏莲花,吴玲,卓超,苏丹虹,张朝霞,季萍,徐元宏,熊自忠,沈继录,单斌,杜艳.2009年中国CHINET鲍曼不动杆菌细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2010,10(6):441-446. 被引量:137
  • 2Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute(CLSI). Perform- ance standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing [S]. M100-22, 2012.
  • 3Towner KJ. Acinetobacter: an old friend, but a new enemy[J]. J HospInfect, 2009, 73(4) :355-363.
  • 4Bergogne-Brzin E. Resistance of Acinetobacter spp. to anti- microbials-overview of clinical resistance patterns and hera- peutic problems. Acinetobacter, microbiology, epidemiology, infections, management[M]. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 1996 133-183.
  • 5Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter bauman- nii: emergence of a successful pathogen[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2008, 21(3) :538-582.
  • 6Karageorgopoulos DE, Kelesidis T, Kelesidis I, et al. Tigecy- cline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (includlng car-bapenem-resistant) Acinetobacter infections: a review of the scientific evidence[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2008, 62 (1) : 45-55.
  • 7Anthony KB, Fishman NO, Linkin DR, et al. Clinical and microbiological outcomes of serious infections with multidrug- resistant Gram-negative organisms treated with tigecycline [J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2008, 46(4): 567-570.
  • 8Schafer JJ, Goff DA, Stevenson KB, et al. Early experience with tigecycline for ventilator-associated pneumonia and bac teremia caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter bauman- nil [J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2007, 27(7): 980-987.
  • 9Reid GE, Grim SA, Aldeza CA, et al. Rapid development of Acinetobacter baumannii resistance to tigecycline[J]. Phar- macotherapy, 2007, 27(8): 1198-1201.
  • 10Peleg AY, Adams J, Paterson DL. Tigeeycline efflux as a mechanism for nonsusceptibility in Acinetobacter baurnannii [J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2007, 51 (6): 2065- 2069.

共引文献119

同被引文献83

  • 1Herwig Cerwenka.Pyogenic liver abscess: Differences in etiology and treatment in Southeast Asia and Central Europe[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(20):2458-2462. 被引量:48
  • 2赵小芹,朱晓巍,徐湘,许岚.肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿临床特征分析[J].中华临床感染病杂志,2011,4(6). 被引量:7
  • 3Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty- Fourth Informational Supplement CLSI document M100- $24[S]. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2014.
  • 4Asghar A H. Molecular characterization of methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from tertiary care hospitals[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2014, 30(4): 698-702.
  • 5Patel R, Gallagher J C. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia pharmacotherapy[J]. Ann Pharmacother, 2015, 49(1): 69-85.
  • 6Bebell L M, Muiru A N. Use and Emerging Resistance : How can resource-limited countries turn the tide? [J]. Global Heart, 2014 , 9 ( 3): 347-358.
  • 7Grundmann H, Klugman KP, Walsh T, etal. A frame- work for global surveillance of antibiotic resistance [J]. Drug Resist Updat, 2011 ,14(2) :79-87.
  • 8Zheng W, Yuan S, Li L. Analysis of hospital departmen- tal distribution and antibiotic susceptibility of Acineto- bacter isolated from sputum samples[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2013,41 (8) : e73-76.
  • 9Hu F,Chen S, Xu X,et al. Emergence of cabapenem-re- sistant clinical enterobacteriaceae isolates from a teaching hospital in Shanghai,China[J]. J Med Microbiol, 2012,61 (Ptl) : 132-136.
  • 10Meyer E, Gastmeier P, Deja M, et al. Antibiotic con- sumption and resistance: Data from Europe and Germany [J]. Int J Med Microbiol, 2013 ,303(6-7) :388-395.

引证文献8

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部