期刊文献+

浅覆盾构隧道开挖面挤出刚性锥体破坏模式极限分析 被引量:15

Three-dimensional limit analysis of blow-out failure modes of shallow shield tunnels
原文传递
导出
摘要 浅覆隧道盾构施工过程中可能引起开挖面挤出破坏。为研究开挖面破坏规律,借助已有刚性锥体破坏模式,推导隧道开挖面三维临界挤出压力表达式,建立极限分析上限法非线性规划模型并编程求解。利用该程序,研究了隧道埋深、地层参数等因素与开挖面临界挤出压力曲线关系及破坏模式的演化特征。结果表明,隧道埋深和土体内摩擦角对开挖面临界挤出压力及挤出破坏模式影响较大。发生挤出破坏时,开挖面附近和上方地表范围为主要破坏区域。最后,利用上限法和有限差分法对长沙地铁2号线长沙大道—体育公园站区间隧道某浅埋段进行开挖面稳定性分析,上限法与有限差分法所得结果相互印证,但上限法计算更为简便。 Blow-out failure of shallow tunnels may occur during shield construction process. To study failure rules, based on the upper bound limit analysis of rigid blocks, three-dimensional expressions for the critical blow-out face pressures are derived using the existing failure modes, and the results are optimized by means of the nonlinear programming model. The relations between the critical blow-out face pressures and influence factors such as formation parameters and buried depth are studied. Meanwhile, the failure modes under different conditions are also explored by use of the program. The results show that both the buried depth and the internal friction angle have great effects on the critical pressures and failure modes. The failure regions mainly range from the surroundings to the surface above the face within blow-out failure. Finally, face stability of a shallow tunnel of Changsha Metro Line 2 (from Changsha Road to Sports Park) is discussed by using the upper bound method and the finite difference method. The results obtained by the two methods are in agreement, but the upper bound method is actually more convenient.
出处 《岩土工程学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第7期1344-1349,共6页 Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基金 国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAK24B02) 国家自然科学基金项目(51008309)
关键词 浅覆隧道 极限分析 上限法 开挖面 三维破坏模式 挤出破坏 shallow tunnel limit analysis upper bound method tunnel face three-dimensional failure mode blow-out failure
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献54

  • 1朱伟,秦建设,卢廷浩.砂土中盾构开挖面变形与破坏数值模拟研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(8):897-902. 被引量:115
  • 2秦建设.盾构隧道施工中开挖面失稳事故分析[J].浙江建筑,2005,22(B10):48-50. 被引量:10
  • 3黄正荣,朱伟,梁精华,秦建设.盾构法隧道开挖面极限支护压力研究[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(10):112-116. 被引量:52
  • 4[1]Atkinson J H, Potts D M. Subsidence above shallow tunnels in soft Ground[J]. J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 1977,103: 307-325.
  • 5[2]Cording e J, Hansmire W H, Macpherson H H, e tal. Displacement around tunnels in Soils[R]. Report prepared for department of transportation, Urbana: University of illinois, Ill, 1976.
  • 6[3]Potts D M. Behaviours of lined and unlined tunnels in sands[ph D thesis], England: Aambridge University, 1976.
  • 7[4]Corbett I. Load and Displacement Variation along a Tunnel[ph D thesis], Canada: University of Alberta, 1984.
  • 8[5]Hansmire W, Cording E J. Soil tunnel test section: Case history summary[J]. J. Geotech. Engrg, ASCE, 1985,111: 1 301-1 320.
  • 9[6]Guttler U, Stoffers U. Investigation of the deformation and collapse behaviour of circular lined tunnels in centrifuge model tests[A]. Centrifuges in Soil Mechanics[C]. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1988.183-186.
  • 10[7]Shinichiro Imamura, Toshiyuki Hagiwara, Kenji Mito, -et al. Settlement trough above a model shield observed in a centrifuge[A]. Centrifuge 98[C]. Tokyo, 1998, 713-719.

共引文献239

同被引文献104

引证文献15

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部