期刊文献+

标准一线化疗联用贝伐珠单抗在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者治疗中的成本-效果分析 被引量:5

Cost-effectiveness of fi rst-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的从我国现阶段医疗卫生角度出发,评价四川地区一线化疗联用贝伐珠单抗治疗晚期非小细胞癌的成本-效果性。方法依据NCT00021060临床试验数据,结合四川地区医疗费用水平,采用成本-效果分析法,以增量成本-效果比为评价指标,评价标准一线化疗联用贝伐珠单抗在晚期非小细胞癌治疗方案的优劣,并分析结果敏感度。结果与标准一线化疗组相比,贝伐珠单抗组ICER为1 909 117.8元/年;敏感度分析结果提示,贝伐珠单抗使用成本和医疗检查成本对总成本影响最大,其他参数影响较小。结论从我国现阶段医疗卫生角度出发,与标准一线化疗相比,四川地区晚期非小细胞肺癌一线化疗联用贝伐珠单抗,不具有成本效果优势。 Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the perspective of Chinese health care system. Methods According to the clinical data of NCT00021060, we used the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to estimate the cost- effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab for patients with advanced NSCLC by the incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) in Sichuan province. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability. Results Compared with first-line chemotherapy, ICER of the bevacizumab group was RMB 1 909 117.8 per year. The sensitiv- ity analysis indicated that the cost of bevacizumab and the medical examination fee had the greatest influence on the total cost among all parameters. Conclusion Bevacizumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy may not be a cost-effective option in advanced NSCLC from the perspective of Chinese health care system at present.
出处 《中南药学》 CAS 2014年第9期925-928,共4页 Central South Pharmacy
关键词 贝伐珠单抗 成本-效果 非小细胞肺癌 敏感度分析 bevacizumab cost-effectiveness non-small-cell-lung sensitivity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献70

共引文献225

同被引文献94

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部