摘要
目的探讨不同义齿修复手段治疗牙列缺损的临床疗效及患者满意度。方法将97例患者分为活动义齿组、固定义齿组及固定种植组3组,治疗后观察患者的主观感受及满意度。结果在咀嚼功能、固定功能、舒适程度、方便程度以及美观程度5个方面,3组患者主观感受有统计学差异(P<0.05);活动义齿组对费用和治疗周期方面满意度最高,固定种植组最低,3组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论固定种植义齿修复牙列缺损效果好,患者主观感受评价高,但是仍需改进。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction for different denture means. Methods 97 patients were divided into denture group, fixed partial denture group and fixed implant group, and treated by different denture means, and the subjective feeling and treatment satisfaction was investigated. Results The subjective feeling of masticatory function, fixed function, comfort, convenience and beautiful degree between three groups was statistically significant difference（P〈0.05）. On cost and treatment cycle, the difference between three groups was significant （P〈0.05）, the satisfaction in denture group was higher, while in fixed implant group was lower. Conclusion The effect of fixed implant denture restoration for dentition defect is good, the subjective feeling evaluation is high, but still need to be improved.
出处
《基层医学论坛》
2014年第31期4188-4190,共3页
The Medical Forum
关键词
牙列缺损
固定种植义齿
活动义齿
固定义齿
疗效
满意度
Defect of dentition
Fixed implant denture
Denture
Fixed partial denture
Curative effect
Satisfaction
