期刊文献+

三值逻辑与意义理论 被引量:2

Three-Valued Logic and the Theory of Meaning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 乌卡谢维奇的三值逻辑反对古典逻辑的矛盾律和排中律,引起了一系列哲学问题。古典逻辑的基础是二值原则,即任何句子要么是真的要么是假的。乌卡谢维奇把第三值指派给不能确定真假的句子。如何理解第三值是三值逻辑的关键问题。从意义理论的角度看,既不真也不假的句子被赋予第三值是因为它们的真之条件未能得到理解而造成的。对于"明天将有海战"这样的时态句子,运用时态逻辑的语义学,第三值是可以消除的。 Lukasiewicz's three-valued logic refutes the law of contradiction and the law of excluded middle.Thus a series of philosophical problems are produced.The foundation of classical logic is the bivalence principle,i.e.,any sentence is either true or false.ukasiewicz assigned the third logical value to sentences which are neither true nor false.The crucial problem of three-valued logic is how to understand the third logical value.From the view point of meaning theory,the reason for assigning the third logical value to those sentences that are neither true nor false is that their truth conditions are not understood.By using the semantics of tense logic,the third logical value for the temporal sentence'there will be sea battles tomorrow'can be eliminated.
作者 马明辉
出处 《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期21-28,189,共8页 Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"模态可定义性理论研究"(12CZX054) 项目负责人:马明辉
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Malinowski G. A Philosophy of Many Valued Logic. The Third Logical Value and Beyond[M]//The Golden Age of Polish Philos phy. Springer Netherlands, 200,9:81 ,92.
  • 2Malinowski G. Many valued logic and its philosophy[J]. Handbook of the History of Logic, 2007, 3:13-94.
  • 3Aristotle. Categories and de Interpretatione[M]. Translated with Notes by J.L. Ackrill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.
  • 4Beaney, M. (Ed.). The Frege Reader[M]. Wiley Blackwell, 1997.
  • 5Dummett M A E. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics[M]. Cambr dge, Mass: Harvard university press, 1993.
  • 6Heyting A. Intuitionism: an introduction[M]. Amsterdam: North Holland Pub. Co., 1956.
  • 7Lukasiewicz J, Borkowski L. Selected works[M]. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1970.
  • 8Findlay J N. Meinong's theory of objects and values[M]. Oxford Clarendon Press, 19G3.
  • 9Russell B. On denoting[J]. M nd, 1905, 14(5G): 479- 493.
  • 10Davidson D. Truth and meaning[J]. Synthese, 19G7, 17(1): 304- 323.

二级参考文献10

  • 1陈波.一个与归纳问题类似的演绎问题——演绎的证成[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):84-95. 被引量:18
  • 21998年.《奎因哲学研究》.三联书店.
  • 32000年.《逻辑哲学导论》.中国人民大学出版社.
  • 4达米特.2004年.《形而上学的逻辑基础》.任晓明,李国山译.中国人民大学出版社.
  • 5弗雷格.2006年.《论涵义和意谓》.《弗雷格哲学逻辑论著选辑》.王路译,王炳文校.商务印书馆.
  • 6奎因.1987年.《经验论的两个教条》.《从逻辑的观点看》.上海译文出版社.
  • 72005年.《亚里士多德的逻辑学说》.中国社会科学出版社.
  • 8Haack,Susan, 1996, “Dummett' s justification of deduction”, in Susan Haack, Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic, London: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd..
  • 9Quine, W.V. ,1970,Philosophy of Logic, Prentice-Hall, Inc..
  • 101994, “Two dogmas of empiricism”, in From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press.

共引文献21

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部