摘要
编辑是一种社会行动(者),作为社会行动(者)的学术编辑具有主体间性与文本间性相统一、知识的传播性与生产性相统一的特性。根据帕森斯模式变量框架的分析,学术编辑的行动取向可以划分为"以人为本"与"以文为本"两种"理想类型"。现实中的学术编辑实践大都处于两种理想类型的中间地带。真正理想的学术编辑应以是否有利于科学的知识的传播和生产为衡量标准。学术编辑可以充分发挥沟通理性,在与作者、读者、同行、文本等的互动交流中寻求合理合适的编辑策略与机制,通过不断的交往实践完成知识传播与生产的使命。
Editing is a kind of social action, and academic editing is a unity of subjects and articles, and the trans-mission of knowledge and production. Within the variable frame of Parson’s mode, academic editors’ action can be divid-ed into two ideal types, namely, “human-oriented” and “article-oriented”. However, academic editors in real life are with-in the transition zone of these two ideal types. The really ideal criterion for an academic editor should be the advocation for knowledge transmission and production. Academic editors can fully play their roles by finding an appropriate and rea-sonable strategy and mechanism through interacting with authors, readers, peers and passages.
出处
《南通大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2014年第6期128-132,共5页
Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CSH002)