期刊文献+

舒适护理在人工流产围手术期的应用效果比较 被引量:4

Application Effect of Comfortable Nursing in the Perioperative Artificial Abortion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察舒适护理在人工流产围手术期的应用效果。方法:选择在本科门诊手术室行人工流产术的128例患者,将其随机分为两组,舒适护理干预组(简称观察组)和常规护理干预组(简称对照组),每组各64例,护理干预后观察两组患者的抑郁、焦虑改善情况、护理满意度以及生活质量。结果:护理前,观察组患者的HAMD评分总分为(22.9±4.1)分,精神性因子分为(10.3±3.3)分,躯体性因子分为(14.5±3.8)分,与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。护理后,观察组患者的HAMD评分总分为(13.2±5.1)分,精神性因子分为(5.6±4.0)分,躯体性因子分为(7.0±2.1)分,均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理前,观察组患者的HAMA评分总分为(25.8±5.6)分,精神性因子分为(14.2±4.7)分,躯体性因子分为(12.7±3.9)分,与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。护理后,观察组患者的HAMA评分总分为(14.7±6.0)分,精神性因子分为(7.4±5.4)分,躯体性因子分为(8.2±4.6)分,均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经护理干预后,观察组患者的满意度为92.19%,对照组为81.25%,观察组优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者均无失访现象,观察组患者随访3个月时的PF得分(71.5±11.0)分,RP得分(74.1±13.7)分,RE得分(76.3±15.3)分,随访6个月时患者的PF得分(87.4±12.6)分,RP得分(86.5±11.7)分,RE得分(84.2±13.4)分;均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:舒适护理可有效降低人工流产术围手术期患者的抑郁、焦虑情绪,提高患者的护理满意度,有益于改善护患关系,提高生活质量。 Objective:To observe the application effect of comfortable nursing care on the abortion operation period of artificial.Method:128 patients with artificial abortion were randomly divided into two groups,comfortable nursing intervention group(the observation group) and routine nursing group(control group),64 cases in each group, the anxiety condition and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were observed after the intervention.Result:Before nursing,HAMD score of the observation group was(22.9± 4.1)points,mental factor was(10.3±3.3),body factors was(14.5±3.8),compared with control group,there was no statistically significant difference(P〉0.05).After nursing,HAMD score of the observation group was(13.2±5.1), mental factor was(5.6±4.0), body factors was(7.0±2.1),which were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Before nursing,HAMA score of the observation group was(25.8±5.6) points,mental factor was(14.2±4.7), body factors was(12.7±3.9),compared with control group,there was no statistically significant difference(P〉0.05).After nursing,HAMA score of the observation group was(14.7±6.0) points, mental factor was(7.4±5.4), body factors was(8.2±4.6), which were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05).After nursing intervention, the observation group of patients' satisfaction was 92.19%, the control group was 81.25%, the observation group was better than that of control group,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Patients were lost to follow-up the two groups, observation group patients were followed up for 3 months at the time of the PF(71.5±11.0) points, the RP score(74.1±13.7), RE(76.3±15.3) points, when patients were followed up for 6 months of PF score(87.4±12.6), the RP score(86.5±11.7), RE(84.2±13.4) points,which were higher than those of the control group, with significant difference(P〈0.01). Conclusion: Comfortable nursing care can effectively reduce the artificial abortion operation in anxiety patients, improve nursing satisfaction of patients, help to improve the nurse-patient relationship.
作者 刘秀芳
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2014年第32期85-87,共3页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 人工流产术 舒适护理 护理满意度 焦虑 Artificial Comfortable nursing care Nursing satisfaction Anxious
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献67

共引文献112

同被引文献39

  • 1Chen X,Chen M,Xu B,et al.Parental phenols exposure and spontaneous abortion in Chinese population residing in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River[J].Chemosphere,2013,93(2):217-222.
  • 2李雪花,李雪梅,陈文静.人工流产术后女性避孕知识知晓与需求情况分析[J].中国公共卫生,2015,31(A02):338-339.
  • 3Jones R K,Jerman J.Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States,2011[J].Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,2014,46(1):3-14.
  • 4Janiak E,Kawachi I,Goldberg A,et al.Abortion barriers and perceptions of gestational age among women seeking abortion care in the latter half of the second trimester[J].Contraception,2014,89(4):322-327.
  • 5Bayer L L,Edelman A B,Fu R,et al.An Evaluation of Oral Midazolam for Anxiety and Pain in First-Trimester Surgical Abortion:A Randomized Controlled Trial[J].Obstetrics&Gynecology,2015,126(1):37-46.
  • 6Huo X X,Gao E S,Cheng Y M,et al.Effect of interpregnancy interval after a mifepristone-induced abortion on neonatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancy[J].Contraception,2013,87(1):38-44.
  • 7Janiak E,Kawachi I,Goldberg A,et al.Abortion barriers and perceptions of gestational age among women seeking abortion care in the latter half of the second trimester[J].Contraception,2014,89(4):322-327.
  • 8Krashin J W,Edelman A B,Nichols M D,et al.Prohibiting consent:what are the costs of denying permanent contraception concurrent with abortion care[J].American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2014,211(1):76-80.
  • 9Collett T S.Previability Abortion and the Pain of the Unborn[J].Wash&Lee L Rev,2014,71(3):1211-1215.
  • 10任玉秀.人工流产治疗观察及计划生育服务300例探讨[J].中国现代医生,2010,48(33):109-110. 被引量:13

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部