期刊文献+

护理干预对前列腺电切术后硬膜外镇痛期间穿刺部位的影响 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨护理干预对前列腺电切术后硬膜外镇痛期间穿刺部位的影响。方法 :将66例TURP术后进行硬膜外镇痛的患者随机分成两组,每组33人,非干预组常规护理,干预组进行系统的护理,观察两组留置期间皮肤情况。结果:与非干预组相比,干预组穿刺部位红肿发生较少,两者在统计学上有差异(P<O.O5)。结论:护理干预能够减少硬膜外镇痛穿部位红肿。
出处 《包头医学》 2014年第4期247-248,共2页 Journal of Baotou Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

  • 1Kasuda H,Fukuda H,Tygashi H,et al. Skin disinfection before epiduraI catheterization: comparative study of povidoneiodine versus chlorhexidine ethanol[J]. Dermatology, 2002, 204(Suppl 1) :42-46.
  • 2Bubeck J, Boos K, Krause H, et al. Subcutaneous tunneling of caudal catheters reduces the rate of bacterial colonization to that of lumbar epidural catheters[J]. Anesth Analg,2004,99 (9) :689-693.
  • 3Tamanai-Shacoori Z, Shacoori V, Vo Van JM, et al. Sufentanil modifies the antibacterial activity of bupivacaine and ropivacaine [J]. Can J Anesth,2004,51(11) :911-914.
  • 4Wheatley RG, Schug SA,Watson D. Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia Watson[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2001,87(7):47-61.
  • 5[1]Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe: Results of the European prevalence of infection in intensive care(EPIC)study. JAMA, 1995,274: 639.
  • 6[2]Jarvis WR, Edwards JR, Culver DH, et al. The national nosocomial infections surveillance system: Nosocomial infection rates in adult and pediatric intensive care units in the United States. Am J Med, 1991, 91: 185S.
  • 7[3]Meyer KS, Archer GL. Nosocomial outbreak of Klebsiella infection resistant to late-generation cephalosporins. Ann Intern Med, 1993, 119: 353.
  • 8[4]Livermore DM. Bacterial resistance to carbapenems.Adv Exper Med Biol, 1996, 390: 2548.
  • 9[5]Jean L, Jean C, Jacaues A. Antibiotic resistance problems in the critical care unit. Crit Care Clin, 1998,14: 199.
  • 10郑瑞强,杨毅,邱海波,周韶霞,刘少华,高良.综合性ICU获得性感染的调查分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2000,10(1):1-3. 被引量:147

共引文献10

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部