摘要
公有制经济与私有制经济、计划经济与市场经济、按劳分配与按资分配,这些一度被当作相互对立的社会主义与资本主义两种经济制度,无论在西方资本主义国家还是在中国社会主义初级阶段,都出现了相互融合的趋势,从而形成了具有共同特征的"混合经济";而分别构成传统社会主义经济制度与资本主义经济制度理论基础的两大经济思想体系,即马克思主义经济学与新古典主义经济学,本来也都源自同一个经济学鼻祖——亚当·斯密,只是由于对亚当·斯密价值理论的不同理解、误解和传承才分道扬镳,但从两大经济学思想体系所追求的终极目标,以及对目前社会主义国家和资本主义国家经济转型和混合经济形成所产生的共同影响来看,两者似乎又殊途同归。有鉴于此,全面评价亚当·斯密的价值理论,重新甄别古典价值理论中的科学成分和庸俗成分,批判地借鉴和吸收各派价值理论的合理成分,构建一个既能包容传统的劳动价值论又能克服新古典价值论逻辑矛盾的广义价值论,无疑是两大经济思想体系从对峙最终走向融合的必要前提。
The institutions which used to be regarded as opposed to each other , such as public ownership vs. private ownership, planning economy vs. market economy, distribution according to work vs. distribution according to capital, have currently been amalgamated and formed the mixed economy, both in the Western countries and in China. Marxian economics and Neo-classical economics, as the theoretical foundations of the Socialist economy and Capitalist economy respectively, were of the same origin： Adam Smith. Though they used to be considered different, as each inherits and interprets Smith＇s theory of value from its own perspective, they have seemed to end up being the same in guiding the economy transformation or mixed economy for Socialism and for Capitalism. And the establishment of a general theory of value both integrating Labor Theory of Value and eliminating the logical paradox of Neo-classical theory of value is the precondition to amalgamate Marxian economics and Neo-classical economics.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期62-75,共14页
Academic Monthly
