期刊文献+

基于THERP—Markov原理的高铁列调人因可靠性分析 被引量:6

Human Reliability Analysis on High-speed Train Dispatcher Based on THERP and Markov Theories
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在高速铁路调度指挥系统中,列调人员通过调度终端来指挥铁路现场的生产活动,调度员的操作直接影响列车的运行.本文引入核电工业中的THERP理论,结合列调操作特征来计算静态条件下列调操作失误率及其置信区间;并结合马尔科夫链原理,建立状态转移率方程,通过拉普拉斯变换得出单影响因子作用下列调可靠性的状态概率变化规律.最后,以执行列控限速任务为例,得出列调的静态失误率及压力影响因子作用下人因动态可靠性变化规律.研究结果表明:在压力适中的情况下,列控限速执行失败率最低,为0.010 4. In the dispatching system of high-speed railway, the dispatching terminal equipment is used by dispatchers who manage the running high-speed trains and related production activities, so reliability of dispatchers is directly related to the safety of high-speed trains. In this paper, THERP theory is introduced from nuclear plant industry to calculate the failure rate and the corresponding confidence intervals of dispatchers under static conditions, combining with the characteristics of their job content. According to the Markov chain theory, then the probability state transferring equations is established to study law of the dispatcher reliability under a certain influencing factor, by Laplace transform. Finally, the task about setting train speed limitation done by the dispatcher is taken for an example to analyze the static and dynamic reliability, when the person is under the influence of different level of pressure. The results show that human error rate about setting train speed limitation is lowest with 0.010 4 under medium pressure state.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期133-140,共8页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(U1234206) 西南交通大学博士研究生创新基金(2015)
关键词 铁路运输 人因可靠性 THERP理论 马尔科夫链 动态可靠性 railway transportation human reliability THERP theory Markov chain dynamic reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of humanreliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications[R]. NUREG/CR-- 1278, 1983.
  • 2Brune R L, Weinstein M, Fitzwater M E. Peer-review study of the draft handbook for human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear- power- plant applications[R]. NUREG/CR- 1278.Human Performance Technologies, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA (USA), 1983.
  • 3Kirwan B. The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques--THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part 1--technique descriptions and validation issues[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 1996,27(6):359-373.
  • 4Hollnagel E. Human reliability assessment in context[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2005,37(2): 159.
  • 5Taylor-Adams S, Kirwan B. Human reliability data requirements[J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 1995,12(1):24-46.
  • 6Cooper S E, Bley D C, Parry W G, et al. Knowledge- base for the new human reliability analysis method [C]// A Technique for Human Error Analysis (ATHEANA), 1996.
  • 7苏畅,张恒喜.飞机作战效能评估中人的可靠性的引入方法[J].航空学报,2006,27(2):262-266. 被引量:8
  • 8张兴昌.列车调度员系统可靠性探讨[J].上海铁道科技,2011(1):22-23. 被引量:2
  • 9王洁,方卫宁,苗冲冲,郭北苑.地铁行车调度员人误模式结构化分析[J].人类工效学,2013,19(1):55-58. 被引量:8
  • 10谢红卫,孙志强,李欣欣,李政仪,张明,史秀建,李龙.典型人因可靠性分析方法评述[J].国防科技大学学报,2007,29(2):101-107. 被引量:53

二级参考文献59

  • 1Luczak R S.Comparative assessment of human error in autonomous production cells[A].In:The Cognitive Work Process:Automation and Interaction[C].Neubiberg,Bonn:8th Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control,2001.167-177.
  • 2Patterson B.To err is human[A].In:Proceedings of the First Workshop on Evaluating and Architecting System dependability[C].Goteborg Sweden,2001.
  • 3Pew D.Modeling human error in a real-world teamwork environment[A].In:Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society[C].Fairfax,VA,2002.274-279.
  • 4Minocha S G.Human errors and system requirements[A].In:IEEE Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium Requirements Engineering[C].Limerick,Ireland:IEEE,1999.23-30.
  • 5董彦非.空中作战效能评估与智能决策[D].西安:空军工程大学,2002.
  • 6Williams H L.Reliability Evaluation of the Human Component in Man-machine Systems[J].Electrical Engineering,April 1958:78-82.
  • 7Shapero A,Cooper J I,Rappaport M,et al.Human Engineering Testing and Malfunction Data Collection in Weapon System Program[R].Report WADD Technical Report 60-36,Wright Air Development Division,Wright-Patterson AFB,OH,1960.
  • 8Meister D.A Critical Review of Human Performance Reliability Predictive Methods[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,1973,22(3):116-123.
  • 9Swain A D,Guttmann H E.Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications (NUREG/CR-1278)[R].Washington,DC:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1983.
  • 10Embrey D E.SLIM-MAUD:An Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilities Using Structured Expert Judgment (NUREG/CR-3518)[R].Washington,DC:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1984.

共引文献66

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部