期刊文献+

Comparison of Two Earthquake Location Methods for Seismic Early Warning

Comparison of Two Earthquake Location Methods for Seismic Early Warning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this paper,according to the Fujian Seismic Network earthquake catalog records,the T now method and the Four Stations Continuous Location method( hereinafter called FSCL)put forward by Jin Xing are inspected by using P-wave arrival information of the first four stations of each seismic event. Results show that for earthquakes within the network,both methods can obtain similar location results and location deviations are small for the majority of the events. For earthquakes outside the network,the location deviation may be amplified as the epicentral distance increases,owing to the seismic station distribution which spread toward the side of the epicenter and the small opening angle between seismic stations used for locating and epicenter. For the FSCL method,the impacts of the wave velocity on the location results may be significant for earthquakes outside the network.Thus,selecting a velocity model which is similar to the actual structure of the wave velocity will contribute to improving location results of earthquakes. The FSCL method can locate more seismic events than the T now method. It concludes that the T now method makes use of mistake information from some non-triggering stations in earthquake catalog,and some P-wave arrivals are not included in the earthquake catalog due to discontinuous records or unclear records of the seismic phase,which induces incorrect location. In this paper, according to the Fujian Seismic Network earthquake catalog records, the Tnow method and the Four Stations Continuous Location method (hereinafter called FSCL) put forward by Jin Xing are inspected by using P-wave arrival information of the first four stations of each seismic event. Results show that for earthquakes within the network, both methods can obtain similar location results and location deviations are small for the majority of the events. For earthquakes outside the network, the location deviation may be amplified as the epicentral distance increases, owing to the seismic station distribution which spread toward the side of the epicenter and the small opening angle between seismic stations used for locating and epicenter. For the FSCL method, the impacts of the wave velocity on the location results may be significant for earthquakes outside the network. Thus, selecting a velocity model which is similar to the actual structure of the wave velocity will contribute to improving location results of earthquakes. The FSCL method can locate more seismic events than the Tnow method. It concludes that the Tnow method makes use of mistake information from some non-triggering stations in earthquake catalog, and some P-wave arrivals are not included in the earthquake catalog due to discontinuous records or unclear records of the seismic phase, which induces incorrect location.
出处 《Earthquake Research in China》 2014年第4期502-509,共8页 中国地震研究(英文版)
基金 funded by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China(2009BAK55B02)
关键词 Earthquake early warning Tnow location method Earthquake catalog Fourstation continuous location method (FSCL) 地震定位方法 地震预警 位置偏差 地震目录 地震事件 错误信息 地震台网 震中距离
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1李山有,金星,马强,宋晋东.地震预警系统与智能应急控制系统研究[J].世界地震工程,2004,20(4):21-26. 被引量:84
  • 2李勇.行星地球地震预警系统(测试版)的初步应用[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(4):1066-1069. 被引量:5
  • 3Cooper J D. Letter to editor, San Francisco Daily Evening Bulletin, 1868, 3: 1968.
  • 4Kamigaichi O, Saito M, Doi K, et al. Earthquake early warning in Japan: warning the general public and future prospects. Seismological Research Letters, 2009, 80 (5) 717-726, doi: 10. 1785/gssrl. 80.5. 717.
  • 5Kamigaichi O. JMA earthquake early warning. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 2004, 4 (3) : 134 -137.
  • 6Allen R M, Brown H, Hellweg M, et al. Realtime test of the ElarmS earthquake early warning methodology. J. Geophys. Res., 2007, 112: B08311.
  • 7Wurman G, Allen R M, Lombard P. Toward earthquake early warning in northern California. Journal of Geophysical Research,2007, 112: B08311, doi: 10. 1029/2006JB004830.
  • 8Iglesias A, Singh S K, Santoyo M A, et al. The seismic alert system for Mexico City: an evaluation of its performance and a strategy for its improvement. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. , 2007, 97(5): 1718 -1729.
  • 9Erdik M, Fahjan Y, Ozel O, et al. Istanbul earthquake rapid response and the early warning system, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 1(1): 157 -163.
  • 10Zollo A, Iannaecone G, Manfredi G. Development and experimentation of a prototype system for seismic early warning applications in Campania region (Southern Italy). Workshop on Seismic Early Warning for European Cities (Abstracts), Napoli, Italy, 2004.

共引文献117

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部