摘要
分裂国家罪案件的司法审判围绕着对该罪罪状的解释、个案中的行为定性、数个行为间的罪数形态认定展开。鉴于司法实践中分裂国家的行为表现极为复杂,组织、策划与实施行为之间的罪数形态认定陷于困境,在对个案行为表现进行充分评价且避免重复评价的前提下,可选择的制度性解决途径有两种:其一,主依手段,慎依目的定罪;其二,将组织行为单独定罪。
The judicial trial of splitting country crime is surrounded by the explanation of the provision,qualitative behavior of individual case,and distinguishing the number and pattern of the crime from a couple of behaviors. Therefore,the behavioral expression of splitting country crime in judicial practice is extremely complex,to identify the number and patter of crime among the behaviors of organization,planning and implementation is in hot water,under the premise of fully evaluation on behavioral expression and avoiding duplicated evaluation in individual case,There are two alternative systematic solution： firstly,to convict crime according to the means,be careful on conviction in accordance with the purpose. Secondly,convict crime on organizational behavior alone.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2014年第2期38-41,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
基金
新疆维吾尔自治区社科规划项目"非法宗教活动的司法认定研究"(12BFX034)
新疆稳定与地区经济发展法制保障研究基地项目"非法宗教活动涉罪问题的司法认定"(010912C05)
霍英东基金会项目"民族独立与民族建设--以民族主义诉求为核心的近代中国民族主义理论研究"(131093)成果之一
关键词
分裂国家罪
罪状
行为类型
罪数形态
The offence of splitting the state
Provision
Behavior Type
Number and Pattern of Crime
