期刊文献+

乳腺手术患者胸椎旁神经阻滞与全身麻醉效果比较的Meta分析 被引量:7

Thoracic paravertebral block versus general anaesthesia for breast surgery:a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:采用系统评价和 Meta 分析方法比较乳腺手术患者行胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB)和全身麻醉(GA)的效果。方法检索 Medline、Springer、Cochrane 图书馆、CNKI、万方数据库及维普数据库,收集比较 TPVB 与 GA 在乳腺手术麻醉效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。应用 Stata 11.0和RevMan 5.1软件进行 Meta 分析。结果获得符合标准的 RCT 研究5个,共计295例患者,其中TPVB 组148例,GA 组147例。Meta 分析结果显示,TPVB 组术后疼痛评分明显高于 GA 组(SMD 2.59,95%CI 1.10~4.08),TPVB 组术后镇痛药使用例次明显少于 GA 组(RR 0.23,95%CI 0.15~0.37),TPVB 组术后恶心呕吐发生率明显低于 GA 组(RR 0.27,95%CI 0.12~0.61)。结论与GA 比较,TPVB 在乳腺手术后具有较高的疼痛评分和较低的镇痛药用量和不良反应发生率。 Objective To explore the effect of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB)versus general anaesthesia (GA)on breast surgery.Methods Public databases were searched including Med-line and Springer,in order to collect randomized controlled trial (RCT)of the effects of TPVB and GA on breast surgery.The data of the meta-analysis was analyzed by Stata 11.0 and RevMan 5.1. Results There were five RCTs consisting of 295 patients with breast surgery,group TPVB (n=148) and group GA (n=147).The overall results of meta-analysis showed that pain scores of group TPVB were higher than those of group GA for breast surgery patients (SMD 2.59,95%CI 1.10-4.08),but the postoperative analgesic consumption and postoperative nausea or vomiting of group TPVB were lower than those of group G (RR 0.23,95%CI 0.15-0.37 and RR 0.27,95%CI 0.12-0.61,respec-tively).Conclusion Compared with GA,TPVB has higher pain scores,lower postoperative anal-gesic consumption and postoperative nausea or vomiting.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期1214-1217,共4页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 胸椎旁神经阻滞 全身麻醉 乳腺手术 META 分析 Thoracic paravertebral block General anesthesia Breast surgery Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Greengrass R, O'Brien F, Lyerly K, et al. Paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery. Can J Anaesth, 1996,43(8) 858-861.
  • 2Kumar A, Srivastava U, Saxena S, et al. Single injection pa- ravertebral block for major cancer breast surgery. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol, 2009,25 (3) : 281-284.
  • 3Pusch F, Freitag H, Weinstabl C, et al. Single-injection pa- ravertebral block compared to general anaesthesia in breast surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1999,43(7) : 770-774.
  • 4Terheggen MA, Wille F, Borel RI, et al. Paravertebral blockade for minor breast surgery. Anesth Analg, 2002, 94 (2) :355-359.
  • 5Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from severalstudies in meta-analysis. BMJ Books, 2005 : 285-312.
  • 6Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring in- consistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 2003, 327 ( 7414): 557-560.
  • 7Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer In.st, 1959,22(4) :719-748.
  • 8DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials, 1986,7(3): 177-188.
  • 9Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, eta[. Bias in meta-analy sis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 1997, 315 (7109) : 629-634.
  • 10Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, et al. Thoracic paraverte- bral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg, 2000, 90 (6) : 1402-1405.

二级参考文献9

共引文献29

同被引文献49

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部