从环境史角度解读特纳的“边疆学说” 被引量：3

A Study of Turner's“Frontier Theory”From the Perspective of Environmental History

下载PDF

导出

摘要特纳之"边疆学说"自诞生后,曾主导美国史坛达三四十年之久,形成了颇具影响力的西部史学派。边疆学说最具创新之处是将"自然"视为美国特色的社会文化形成与演进的重要基础,并吸收了进化论思想。在研究方法上,特纳吸收了哈德逊河派画家的创作意象,很好地论证了其观点。从环境史角度来看,"边疆学说"存在历史主角的缺失、无视西进运动的负面影响等缺欠,它多被指责有"地理环境决定论"倾向。 For three or four decades after its birth, Turner＇ s＂Frontier Theory＂has predominated American history world, and formed the influential West history school. The most innovative features of ＂Frontier Theory＂include the adoption of the theory of evolution, and that nature is seen as an important foundation for formation and evolution of American unique social culture. In research methods, Turner absorbed the creative images of Hudson River School painters, and well proved his point. From the perspective of environmental history, ＂Frontier Theory＂has such deficiency as the absence of historical protagonists, and the neglect of the negative impact of the westward movement, so it is accused of having the tendency of geographical determinism.

作者滕海键

机构地区辽宁大学历史学院

出处《辽宁大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 2015年第1期155-160,共6页 Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基金 2015年度辽宁经济社会发展立项课题成果(2015lslktzilsx-05)

关键词美国环境史专家特纳边疆学说环境史 American environmental historian Turner Frontier Theory, environmental history

分类号 K712.6 [历史地理—世界史]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Richard W.Etulain.Does the Frontier Experience Make America Exceptiona[lM].Boston:Bedford/St.Martin’s,1999.3-5.
2John Mack Faragher.Rereading Frederick Jackson Turner“:The Significance of the Frontier in American History”and Other Essays[M].New York:Henry Holtand Company,1994.1-2.
3Mark Schiffhauer,From Wilderness to Environment:the Role of Nature in Western American History from Frederick Jackson Turner to Donald Worster and the New Western History[D].Philipps Universitat Marburg,2008.19.
4Mark Schiffhauer,From Wilderness to Environment:the Role of Nature in Western American History from Frederick Jackson Turner to Donald Worster and the New Western History[D].Philipps universitat Marburg,2008.19-20.
5John Mack Faragher,Rereading Frederick Jackson Turne[rC].New York:Henry Holt,1994.62.
6Frederick Jackson Turner“,The Significance of the Frontier in American History,”in Martin Ridge,ed.,Frederick Jackson Turner:Wisconsin’s Historian of the Frontier[M].Madison:State Historical Society of Wisconsin,1986.32-34.
7William Cronon,The Trouble with Wilderness:A Response,Environmental History[J].1996(1.1):76.
8Richard W.Etulain,Writing Western History:Essays on Major Western Historians[C].Albuquerque:U of New Mexico P,1991.76.
9Frederick Jackson Turner“,The Significance of the Frontier in American History,”in Martin Ridge,ed.,Frederick Jackson Turner:Wisconsin’s Historian of the Frontier.Madison:State Historical Society of Wisconsin,1986.
10Kornhauser Elizabeth Mankin,Amy Ellis,and Maureen Miesmer,Hudson River School:Masterworks from the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Ar[tM].New Haven and London:Yale UP,2003.6.

二级参考文献17

1保尔·S·波依尔.《荒野与美国精神》序言[A].[美]罗德里克·纳什.大自然的权力[M].杨通进,译.青岛:青岛出版社,1999.2.
2Interview Roderick Nash, Environmental History [J]. Volume 12 Issue 2 April 2007.401.401-402.400- 401,401,405,403.
3Roderick Nash, Wilderness and the American Mind [M]. Yale University Press, 3th edition,1982, Preface to the Third Edition.9.
4http://rocktheearth.org/joomla. Generated: 14 July, 2011, 04:01.
5Roderick Nash, Wilderness and the American Mind[M]. Yale University Press,4th edition,2001.8-20.
6John. R. McNeill, Observations on the Nature and Culture of Environmental history, History and Theory: Studies in the Philosophy of History, Vo.1 42, No. 4. (Dec 2003).6.
7[美]唐纳德·休斯.什么是环境史[M].梅雪芹,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.3、6.
8William Cronon, Modes of Prophecy and Production: Placing Nature in History, Journal of American History, Vo.1 76, No. 4. (March., 1990). 122-1131.
9K.E. Bailes, Environmental History: Critical Issues in Comparative Perspective,Lanham,1955.4.
10Donald Worster, Doing Environmental History,in D.Worster,The ends of the Earth: Perspective on Modern Environmental History[ M ]. Cambridge University Press, 1988.292-293.