期刊文献+

印度专利法阻却药品专利常青同时损害增量创新 被引量:2

Indian Patent Law Deterring Evergreening of Patent or Damaging the Incremental Innovation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的讨论正确面对和处理药品专利常青问题,提出促进我国制药行业创新发展的应对策略。方法分析印度2005年专利法第三条(d)款对已知物质衍生物的药品专利常青禁止性规定的内容、立法背景、争论、意义,并比较美国、欧盟和其他新兴经济体对药品专利常青的规制措施与态度。结果与结论印度专利法第三条(d)款对制药行业增量创新产生负面影响;我国应谨慎对待药品专利常青问题,并考虑在专利审查中提高药品创造性标准。 Objective To find more proper measures to cope with the evergreening of patent in advance and to promote the development of China's pharmaceutical industry.Methods This paper analyzes the content,legislative intention,influence and debates on article 3(d)of Indian Patent Law of 2005 and compares different measures and attitudes towards evergreening of pharmaceutical patent in the United States,EU and some emerging economies.Results and Conclusion The stipulation of article 3(d)in Indian Patent Law will be detrimental to the incremental innovation in pharmaceutical industry and China should be cautious to deal with the issue of evergreening of pharmaceutical patent and the pharmaceutical inventiveness standerd should be correspondingly elevated in patent examination.
作者 赵歆 刘晓海
机构地区 同济大学法学院
出处 《中国药事》 CAS 2014年第12期1285-1289,共5页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
基金 国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"促进自主创新能力建设的国家知识产权政策体系研究"(编号12&ZD073) 国家知识产权局专利保护重点联系机制工作项目(编号20121029952)
关键词 专利常青 印度专利法 第三条(d)款 制药行业 增量创新 药品专利审查 专利标准 evergreening of patent Indian Patent Law Article 3(d) pharmaceutical industry incremental innovation drug patents censorship proprietary standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Inderjit Singh Bansal, Deeptymaya Sahu, Gautam Bakshi, et al. Evergreening- A Controversial Issue in Pharma Milieu [J]. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 2009, 14 (4) : 298-299.
  • 2Raheel Rashad Daureeawo. The Controversy of Section 3 (D) of The Indian Patent Act, LEGALSERVICE INDIA [EB/OL]. ( 2009-11-22 ) [2014-03-22] http: //www. legalserviceindia. corn/article/1400 Controversy-of-Section-3 ( D ) -of-The-Indian- Patent-Act. htrnl.
  • 3Carlos M Correa. 'ubhc Health and l'atent Leglsiatlon In Developing Countries [ J I. J. TECH. INTELL. PROP, 2001, 3 (1): 30-31.
  • 4The Patents (Amendment) Act of 2005 [S]. Ministry of Law and Justice No. 15, 2005.
  • 5黄骊珍,王立达.专利法对医药衍生物发明之合理评价一以已知物质衍生物为中心[J].成大法学,2012(23):70~71.
  • 6Rajarshi Sen Adarsh Ramanujan. Pruning the evergreen tree or tripping up over TRIPS? --Section3 (d) of the Indi- an Patents Act, 1970 [J]. IIC International Review of In- tellectual Property and Competition Law, 2010, 41 (2): 170-172.
  • 7Lisa Kilday. Global IP Reaction to India's Rejection of the Novartis Drug Patent [EB/OL]. (2013-05-28) E2014:0a- 27 ] http //www. ipwatchdog, com/2013/O5/28/global-ip- reaction-to-indias-rejection-of-the-novartis-drug-patent/id = 40778/.
  • 8Centre for Trade and Development (Centad), New Delhi. Competition Law and Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, p79 [R/OL]. (2010) [2014-03-22] http: //www. eci. gov. in/ images/media/eompleted/PharmInd230611, pdf.
  • 9倪娜,刁天喜,王磊,赵晓宇.国外药品专利政策对制药业的影响分析[J].中国新药杂志,2011,20(4):308-311. 被引量:9
  • 10Uttam K, Shukla. Evergreening Patents FEB/OLd. (2011- 08-01) [-2014 03-25 ] http: //nopr. nlscair, res. in/bitstream/ 123456789/12535/1/SR2048 (8) M2031-34. pdf.

二级参考文献4

共引文献8

同被引文献34

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部