期刊文献+

双心护理对冠状动脉旁路移植患者围术期焦虑抑郁的影响 被引量:13

Effect of psychological and cardiological care on perioperative anxiety and depression in patients with CABG
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨双心护理干预对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者围术期焦虑抑郁的影响。方法:将115例行冠状动脉造影确定需要行CABG患者随机分为干预组60例和对照组55例。对照组给予常规护理,干预组在此基础上给予双心护理,即在注重患者心血管疾病整体护理同时强化心理护理的现代护理模式,并给予氟哌噻吨美利曲辛片和舍曲林等药物干预。从社区选取25位与患者性别、年龄、生活状况相近的正常人作为正常对照组,采用Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)对三组进行焦虑抑郁评估。结果:干预前干预组和对照组SAS和SDS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但均明显高于正常对照组(P<0.01);术后干预组SAS和SDS评分均比术前降低(P<0.01),且低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:双心护理干预明显减轻或缓解CABG围术期患者焦虑和抑郁情绪,有助于改善预后。 Objective: To investigate the effect of psychological and cardiological care on perioperative anxiety and depression in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting( CABG). Methods: 115 patients who would receive CABG were randomly divided into the intervention group( n = 60) and the control group( n = 55). The patients in the control group were given routine nursing care and the patients in the intervention group were provided psychological and cardiological care and drug intervention using Flupentixol and melitracen tablets and Sertraline. 25 healthy people were selected from the community as the normal control group. The anxiety and depression of the patients in the three groups was respectively assessed by using the Zung self- rating Anxiety Scale( SAS) and self- rating Depression Scale( SDS).Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the comparison of SAS and SDS scores between the two groups before the intervention( P〉0. 05),but they were significantly higher than those in normal control group( P〈0. 01); the scores of SAS and SDS decreased after operation compared with those before operation in the intervention group( P〈0. 01),and they were lower in the intervention group than the control group( P〈0. 01). Conclusion: The psychological and cardiological care can obviously alleviate or relieve the perioperative anxiety and depression of patients with CABG and it help to improve the prognosis.
出处 《齐鲁护理杂志》 2015年第2期1-3,共3页 Journal of Qilu Nursing
基金 山东省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:ZR2010HM081)
关键词 双心护理 冠脉旁路移移植术 围术期 焦虑 抑郁 Psychological and cardiological care CABG Perioperative period Anxiety Depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献57

  • 1曾侃.主动脉内气囊反搏术48例临床分析[J].中华外科杂志,1995,33(8):494-496. 被引量:6
  • 2黄丽,姜乾金,任蔚红.应对方式、社会支持与癌症病人心身症状的相关性研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):160-161. 被引量:431
  • 3彭军,蓝峰,何国欢.冠心病患者焦虑抑郁情绪临床分析[J].广西医学,2006,28(3):364-366. 被引量:12
  • 4王骞,许俊亭.抑郁与焦虑共病障碍临床研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(1):27-28. 被引量:13
  • 5陈建平,顾卫平,卢尔滨,杨丽春.冠心病患者情绪障碍调查[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(3):142-144. 被引量:144
  • 6[1]Anderson R D,Ohman E M.Use of intra-aortic counterpulsation in pat i ents presenting with cardiogenic shock:Observation from the GUSTO-I study[J] .J Am Coll Cardiol,1997,30:708~715.
  • 7[2]Ohman E M,George B S,White C J,et al.Use of aortic counterp ulsation to improve sustained coronary artery patency during acute myocardial in farction:Results of randomized trial[J].Circulation,1994,90:792~799.
  • 8[3]Ohman E M,Califf R M,George B S,et al.The use of intra -aortic bal loon pumping as an adjunct to reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction [J].Am Heart J,1991,121:895~901.
  • 9[4]Christenson J T,Simonet F.The effect of preoperative intra-aortic b alloon pump support in high risk patients requiring myocardial revascularizatio n[J].J Cardiovasc Sury Torino,1997,38:397~402.
  • 10[5]Bengtson J R,Kaplan A J,Pieper K S,et al.Prognosis in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction in the interventional era[J].J Am Col l Cardiol,1992,20:1482~1489.

共引文献224

同被引文献112

  • 1郑磊磊,王也玲,李惠春.医院焦虑抑郁量表在综合性医院中的应用[J].上海精神医学,2003,15(5):264-266. 被引量:255
  • 2杨意念,刘希红,戴小明,邵燕,杭铮,何文霞.系统心理干预对冠状动脉搭桥术患者焦虑抑郁的影响[J].护理学杂志,2006,21(8):1-3. 被引量:9
  • 3李峥.护理研究中的质性研究(一)[J].中国护理管理,2007,7(4):78-80. 被引量:127
  • 4贝政平,蔡映云.内科疾病诊断标准[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2007:246-250.
  • 5Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010[J]. Lancet,2012,380(9859) :2095-2128.
  • 6Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2015 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association[ J]. Circulation,2015,131 (4) : e29-e322.
  • 7Hu S, l~i Q, Gao P, et al. Simultaneous Hybrid Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass for Muhivessel Coronary Artery Disease[J]. Ann Thorac Surg,2011,91 (2) :432-438.
  • 8Shen L, Hu S, Wang H, et al. One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Treatment of Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013,61 (25) : 2525-2533.
  • 9Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison [ J ]. J Thorac Cardiovase Surg, 2010,139 ( 4 ) : 926- 932.
  • 10Zaky A, Bradley WE, Lazrak A, et al. Chlorine inhalation-induced myocardial depression and failure [ J]. Physiological Reports, 2015,3(6) :e12439.

引证文献13

二级引证文献107

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部