摘要
对2007年-2013年《中国海关知识产权保护状况》的分析显示:我国海关在出口环节查扣的侵犯知识产权货物大部分为涉嫌商标侵权的涉外定牌加工货物。理论研究表明,涉外定牌加工的货物不是侵权货物,贴牌行为并未侵犯国内的商标权。近年,多数法院已认定涉外定牌行为不构成商标侵权。海关对涉外定牌加工货物的行政执法应与司法裁判保持一致;海关采用“被动保护”模式符合《TRIPS协定》的要求。立法机关应立足国情,尽快修改和完善《知识产权海关保护条例》。
An analysis on China Customs Protection of Intellectual Property(2007-2013) reveals that most goods infringing intellectual property detained by customs are suspected to be infringing trademarks OEM goods. Theoretical Research shows that OEM exports are not the infringing goods and the signs-attaching behavior per se does not infi'inge domestic trademark rights. Recent years, the courts also find that the Original Equipment Manufacturing does not constitute infi'ingement of trademarks. The Customs enforcement decisions should be in conformity with the court rulings. A passive protection mechanism by the Customs complies with the requirements of TRIPS. The legislature should improve and revise the Regulation of the PRC on the Customs Protection of Intellectual Property Rights based upon national conditions.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期31-36,共6页
Intellectual Property