期刊文献+

基于智能家居的一致性模型融合技术研究 被引量:3

Research on Consistency Model Fusion Technology Based on Smart Home
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在智能家居的自适应软件设计中,往往采用传统的模块构建技术。但由于其适应逻辑存在着低复用性、高复杂度等问题,很难验证模块组合后的正确性及有效性。为了满足开发过程中用户的增量性需求,针对适应逻辑的组合难题,提出把部分行为模型的形式化方法引入到适应行为的描述中。通过三值逻辑KMTS模型描述语言,提出一致性模型的判断方法以及融合算法,以提供明确的适应模型在线融合支持。最后通过智能家居中的一个模型实例来分析并验证融合后的适应逻辑。 In the self-adaptive software design of smart home, the traditional module construction technology is often adopted. However, due to its low reusability and high complexity in adaptive logics, it is very difficult to confirm the correctness and effectiveness of module combination. In order to meet users' incremental demand in development process, this paper proposes to introduce formalization method of partial behavioral model into the description of adaptive behavior based on combination difficulty of adaptive logics. Through three-valued logic KMTS model description language, this paper proposes judgment method and fusion algorithm of consistency model to provide clear online fusion support for adaptive model. Finally, this paper takes a smart home model as an example to analyze and confirm the adaptive logics after fusion.
出处 《浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 2015年第1期109-114,共6页 Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University(Natural Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61202050 61379036) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(Y13F020175) 浙江理工大学521人才培养计划资助项目 浙江省钱江人才计划资助项目(2013R10015) 浙江省新苗计划项目(2013R406070)
关键词 智能家居 模型融合 适应逻辑 KMTS 一致性模型 smart home model fusion adaptive logics KMTS consistency model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Maurel Y, Diaconescu A, Lalanda P. Creating complex, adaptable management strategies via the opportunistic integration of decentralised management resources[C]// Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Adaptive and Intelligent Systems. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 2009: 86-91.
  • 2Sicard S, Boyer F, De Palma N. Using eomponents for architecture-based management: the sel{-repair case [C]//Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering. New York : ACM , 2008: 101-110.
  • 3接钧靖,史庭训,焦文品,孟繁晶.自主构件自适应策略的在线定制及动态评估[J].软件学报,2012,23(4):802-815. 被引量:7
  • 4Uchitel S, Alrajeh D, Ben D S, et al. Supportingincremental behaviour model elaboration[J]. Computer Science-Research and Development, 2013, 28(4): 279- 293.
  • 5Gui N, Florio V D, Blondia C. Transformer: an adaptation framework with contextual adaptation behavior composition support[J]. Software Practice :Experience, 2013, 43(8): 937-967.
  • 6Uchitel S, Kramer J, Magee J. Behaviour model elaboration using partial labelled transition systems[J]. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2003, 28 (5) : 19-27.
  • 7Redon:to R P D, Pazos A J J. Reuse of verification efforts and incomplete specifications in a formalized, iterative and incremental :ftware process[C]//Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. Toronto: IEEE Computer Society, 2001: 801-802.
  • 8Nejati S, Sa'betzadeh M, Chechik M, et al. Matching and merging of variant feature specifications [J]. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2012, 38 (6): 1355 1375.
  • 9易立,赵海燕,张伟,金芝,梅宏.特征模型融合研究[J].计算机学报,2013,36(1):1-9. 被引量:9
  • 10Fisehbein D, Uchitel S. On correct and complete strong merging of partial behaviour models [C]// Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering. New York : ACM, 2008: 297-307.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Cheng BHC, de Lemos R, Giese H, Inverardi P, Magee J, Andersson J, Becker B, Bencomo N, Brun Y, Cukic B, Serugendo GM, Dustdar S, Finkelstein A, Gacek C, Geihs K, Grassi V, Karsai G, Kienle HM, Kramer J, Litoiu M, Malek S, Mirandola R, Miiller HA, Park S, Shaw M, Tichy M, Tivoli M, Weyns D, Whittle J. Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: A Research Roadmap. Leibniz: Schloss Dagstuhl, 2008. 1-26. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02161-9_1].
  • 2Kang K C, Cohen S, Hess J, Nowak W, Peterson S. Fea ture oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. USA: Carnegie Mellon University. Technical Report CMU/ SEI 90 TR 21, 1990.
  • 3Zhang W, Mei H, Zhao H Y. A feature-oriented approach to modeling requirements dependencies//Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering(RE'05). Paris, France, 2005:273 282.
  • 4Batory D, Benavides D, Ruiz-Cort6s A. Automated analysis of feature models: Challenges ahead. Communications of the ACM, 2006, 49(12) 45 47.
  • 5Antkiewicz M, Czarnecki K. FeaturePlugin: Feature model ing plug-in for eclipse//Proceedings of the 2004 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2004:67-72.
  • 6Segura S, Benavides D, Ruiz-Cort6s A, Trinidad P. Auto mated merging of feature models using graph transforma tions//Proeeedings of the GTTSE'07. Berlin, Germany,2008 489-505.
  • 7She S, I.otufo R, Berger T, Wa,sowski A, Czarnecki K. Reverse engineering feature models//Proceedings of the ICSE 11. Waikiki, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2011 : 461-470.
  • 8Acher M, Collet P, I.ahire P, France R. Composing feature models//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software I.anguage Engineering ( S1.E 0 9 ). Denver, Colorado, USA, I.NC85969. 2009:62 81.
  • 9Acher M, Collet P, I.ahire P, France R. Managing multiple software product lines using merging techniques. France: University of Nice Sophia Antipolis. Technical Report, ISRN I3S/RR-2010-06-FR, 2010.
  • 10Broek van den, Pim and Galvao, Ismenia and Noppen, Joost. Merging feature models//Proceedings of the 14th International Software Product Line Conference. Jeju Island, South Korea, 2010.

共引文献14

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部