期刊文献+

73例肛瘘患者的腔内超声影像分析 被引量:3

Endoanal Ultrasound Imaging Analyzation about 73 Cases of Anal Fistula
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Morris肛瘘分级法在肛瘘腔内超声诊断中的应用。方法回顾性分析73例经手术证实的肛瘘瘘管、内口及伴随脓肿的腔内超声表现,用Morris分级法进行分级。结果原发性肛瘘72例,复发性肛瘘1例,其中1级30例,超声漏诊瘘管与内口2例;2级21例,超声同时漏诊瘘管与内口1例,单纯漏诊内口6例;3级9例,4级12例,超声无漏诊;5级1例,内口漏诊。超声诊断瘘管总正确率为95.89%,内口总正确率为86.30%。结论可以应用Morris分级法进行腔内超声肛瘘分级,便于临床交流、决定手术方法。 Objective To investigate the Morris anal fistula classification method in the diagnosis of endoanal ultrasound.Methods From June 2013 to April 2014, 73 patients conifrmed with ifndings from the operation were managed with endoanal ultrasound. All patients were classed based-on ultrasound, including the appearances of ifstula track, internal opening, and abscess companied.Results In 73 patients with 72 primary ifstulas and 1 recurrent ifstula, ratio of grade 1 was 41.10%, ratio of grade 2 was 28.77%, ratio of grade 3 was 12.33%, ratio of grade 4 was 16.44%, ratio of grade 5 was 1.30%. Seven cases of internal opening were missed in grade 2 and 5, and three cases of ifstula tract together with internal opening were missed in grade 1 and 2.Conclusion The Morris classiifcation of ifstula can be applied in the examination with endoanal ultrasound, it is good for doctors to communicate, giving help for the design of surgery.
出处 《中国医药指南》 2015年第3期16-17,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 肛瘘 经直肠腔内超声 Fistula Endoanal ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1Lunniss PJ, Barker PG, Sultan AH, Armstrong P, Reznek RH, Bartram CI, Cottam KS, Phillips RK. Magnetic resonance imaging of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37:708-718.
  • 2MaierAG, Funovics MA, Kreuzer SH, Herbst F, Wunderlich M, Teleky BK, Mittlbock M, Schima W, Lechner GL. Evaluation of perianal sepsis: comparison of anal endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14:254-260.
  • 3Gustafsson-UM, Kahvecioglu B, Astrom G, Ahlstrom H, Graf W. Endoanal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of anal fistula: a comparative study. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3:189-197.
  • 4Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, Fletcher JG, Clain JE, Tremaine WJ, Zinsmeister AR, Norton ID, Boardman LA, Devine RM, Wolff BG, Young-Fadok TM, Diehl NN, Pemberton JH, Sandborn WJ. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology 2001; 121:1064-1072.
  • 5Yee LF, Bimbaum EH, Read TE, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Use of endoanal ultrasound in patients with rectovaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:1057-1064.
  • 6Lindsey I, Humphreys MM, George BD, Mortensen NJ. The role of anal ultrasound in the management of anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4:118-122.
  • 7Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Tarroni D, Cohen CR. Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology 2004; 233:674-681.
  • 8Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surg 1991; 78:445-447.
  • 9Cheong DM, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, Jagelman DG. Anal endosonography for recurrent anal fistulas: image enhancement with hydrogen peroxide. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:1158-1160.
  • 10West RL, Dwarkasing S, Felt-Bersma RJ, Schouten WR, Hop WC, Hussain SM, Kuipers EJ. Hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating perianal fistulas: agreement and patient preference. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16:1319-1324.

共引文献32

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部