期刊文献+

Effect of Season, Location, Cultivar and Spacing on Yield and Quality of Sugarcane in Western Kenya

Effect of Season, Location, Cultivar and Spacing on Yield and Quality of Sugarcane in Western Kenya
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In Kenya almost all sugarcane grown is under rainfall conditions that are planted in different locations during both long and short rainy seasons. Effect of season, location, cultivar and spacing on yield and quality of sugarcane is not clearly understood. The research was conducted at Kibos and Mumias to determine if the yields and quality of three sugarcane cultivars were affected by season, location and row spacing. Cultivars CO 945, EAK 73-335 and KEN 83-737 were manually planted during June and September in 2011. The trial was laid out as split-split plot arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) replicated three times. Data collected at harvest, 17 months after planting (MAP) including cane yields, cane yield components and cane quality. The results revealed that cane length differed significantly between June and September. Stalk population and cane yields were significantly more at Mumias compared to Kibos. Cultivar EAK 73-335 showed significantly more cane yield (t/ha) than KEN 83-737 and CO 945. Both row spacing 1.2 m and 1.5 m did not affect cane yields. Brix%, Sucrose% and Purity% differed significantly between cultivars. The relationship between cane yield and stalk population was positive and significant, which indicated stalk population is a strong determinant of cane yield. The results showed that cane yield was significantly affected by location and cane quality by cultivars. Therefore Mumias is a better zone for sugarcane cultivation for both June and September seasons compared to Kibos.
出处 《Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology(A)》 2014年第9期755-761,共7页 农业科学与技术(A)
关键词 SUGARCANE SEASON LOCATION CULTIVAR yield quality relationship. 甘蔗产量 甘蔗种植 甘蔗品种 行间距 肯尼亚 地点 季节 品质
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2010. "Statistical Database." FAO. Accessed December 20, 2011. http://www, fao st at. fao.org.
  • 2Kenya Sugar Research Foundation. 2006. Technical Bulletin Vol. 1, No. 1.
  • 3Kenya Sugar Board. 2012. Year Book of Sugar Statistics.
  • 4Kenya Sugar Research Foundation. 2010. Growers Guide, 2nd edition.
  • 5lnman-Bambe, N. G. 1994. "Temperature and Seasonal Effects on Canopy Development and Light Interception of Sugarcane." Field Crop Research 36:41-51.
  • 6Robertson, M. J., and Doualdson, R. A. 1998. "Changes in the Components of Cane and Sucrose Yield in Response to Drying-off of Sugarcane before Harvest." Field Crop Res. 55:201-8.
  • 7McDonald, L. M., and Lisson, S. N. 2001. "The Effect of Planting and Harvesting Time on Sugarcane Productivity." Presented at the 10th Australia Agronomy Conference, Hobart, Australia.
  • 8Matherne, R. J. 1976. "Influence of Planting Date on Sugarcane Cultivar Yields in Louisiana." Journal of America Society of Sugar Cane Technologist 6:19-22.
  • 9Ricaud, R., and Arceneaux, A. 1996. Cultural and Land Management Practice Research in Sugarcane in 1995.
  • 10Magrath, J. 2006. Africa-Up in Smoke 2. The second report on Africa from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development, New Economics Foundation, London United Kingdom.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部