摘要
目的探讨急诊治疗出血性胃炎的方法,评价不同方法的临床疗效。方法选择急诊需接受治疗的出血性胃炎患者122例,平均随机分为手术治疗组和保守治疗组,其中手术组患者在手术前也酌情进行适当的药物治疗。分别观察评价两组患者的疗效。结果保守治疗组共61例患者,总有效率为98.4%;手术治疗组61例患者,总有效率为95.1%,两组对比差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。保守治疗组治愈率75.4%较手术治疗组59.0%高,对比差异显著(P<0.05)。结论对出血性胃炎的患者采用哪种方法进行治疗,需要结合患者具体的病情严重程度来判断,保守治疗和手术治疗两种方式效果相差不明显,均有较高的治疗有效率。
Objective To explore the methods of emergency treatment of hemorrhagic gastritis and evaluate the curative effect of different methods. Methods 122 cases of patients with hemorrhagic gastritis treated in the emergency department were selected and were randomly and equally divided into the surgery group and the conservative treatment group. The patients in the surgery group were given appropriate medication before surgery. The curative effects in both groups were respectively observed and evaluated. Results The total effective rate of 61 patients in conservative treatment group was 98. 4% while the total effective rate of 61 patients in the surgery group was 95. 1%. The difference of the two groups was not statistically significant（ P〉0. 05）. The cure rate in the conservative treatment group was 75. 4%,higher than that in the surgery group which was 59%. The differences were statistically significant（ P〈0. 5）. Conclusion Choice of treating methods should be determined by different degrees of severity. There are no obvious differences in clinical effect between conservative treatment and surgical treatment,both methods with high efficiency of treatment.
出处
《辽宁医学院学报》
CAS
2015年第1期27-28,共2页
Journal of Liaoning Medical University (LNMU) Bimonthly
关键词
急诊治疗
出血性胃炎
疗效观察
emergency treatment
hemorrhagic gastritis
observation of curative effect
