摘要
目的:检验家庭教养方式问卷(FUSQ)在青少年正常样本和临床样本中的结构效度。方法:2826名青少年正常样本与322例临床样本接受FUSQ测试,采用验证性因素分析验证两种三因素模型在不同样本中的结构效度。结果:两种三因素模型的RMSEA、拟合指数和增值指数均达到可以接受的水平,三因素修正模型(χ2/df=1.97-10.87,RMSEA=0.055-0.067,MECVI=0.497-1.531,GFI=0.91-0.96,CFI=0.95-0.97)比三因素相关模型(χ2/df=4.62-29.84,RMSEA=0.098-0.114,MECVI=1.699-2.949,GFI=0.76-0.83,CFI=0.85-0.88)更理想;父亲教养方式与母亲教养方式具有类似的结构效度;正常样本数据拟合度(χ2/df=9.92-29.84,RMSEA=0.056-0.101,MECVI=0.497-1.785,GFI=0.82-0.96,CFI=0.87-0.97)优于临床样本(χ2/df=1.97-5.14,RMSEA=0.055-0.114,MECVI=1.334-2.949,GFI=0.76-0.93,CFI=0.85-0.97)。结论:家庭教养方式问卷符合三因子模型,在正常样本和临床样本均具有较好的结构效度。
Objective： To examine the construct validity of Family Upbringing Style Questionnaire（FUSQ）. Methods： FUSQ were administered to 2826 normal adolescents and 322 patients with mental disorder and juvenile delinquency, confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify the construct validity of three-factor model in different groups. Results： RMSEA, fit index and incremental index of two models reached acceptable levels, three-factor correction model（x2/df=1.97- 10.87, RMSEA=0.055-0.067, MECVI=0.497-1.531, GFI=0.91-0.96, CFI=0.95-0.97） was more ideal than the three-factor related model（χ2/df=-4.62-29.84, RMSEA=0.098-0.114, MECVI=1.699-2.949, GFI=0.76-0.83, CFI=0.85-0.88）. The construct validity of fathers＇ upbringing style was similar to mothers. The data fitting of normal samples（χ2/df=9.92-29.84, RM- SEA=0.056-0.101, MECVI=0.497-1.785, GFI=0.82-0.96, CFI=0.87-0.97） was superior to clinical samples（χ2/df=-l.97- 5.14, RMSEA=0.055-O.114, MECVI=1.334-2.949, GFI=0.76-0.93, CFI=0.85-0.97）. Conclusion： Family Upbringing Style Questionnaire suits for the three-factor model and has good construct validity.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第1期26-28,92,共4页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家社会科学基金(13BSH062)
关键词
家庭教养方式
结构效度
因素分析
Family upbringing style
Structural validity
Factor analysis
