期刊文献+

输尿管上段结石患者行微创经皮肾镜与经尿道输尿管镜治疗的效果对比观察 被引量:4

To Compare the Clinical Effects of Upper Ureteral Calculi Patients between Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Transurethral Ureteroscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察和比较输尿管上段结石患者行微创经皮肾镜与经尿道输尿管镜治疗的效果。方法选取本院收治的106例输尿管上段结石患者,随机分为研究组和对照组,每组53例,研究组行微创经皮肾镜碎石术,对照组行经尿道输尿管镜碎石术,比较两组临床效果。结果研究组的手术时间、术中出血量以及住院时间均比对照组少,且研究组的术后并发症发生率5.66%,明显比对照组22.64%低。结论输尿管上段行微创经皮肾镜碎石术的疗效较为显著。 Objective To observe the effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and transurethral ureteroscopy and compared the effects of treatment on patients with ureteral calculi segment. Methods Selected 106 cases of patients with upper ureteral stones segment in the hospital and randomly divided into study group and the control group, 53 cases in each group, the study group received minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotripsy, ureteroscopy group used transurethral lithotripsy, compared the clinical effect. Results Study group operative time, blood loss and hospital stay were less than the control group, and the incidence of postoperative complications in the study group was 5.66%, 22.64%in the control group. Conclusion Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotripsy of ureteral line has significant effect.
作者 乔明洲
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2015年第4期96-97,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 输尿管上段结石 微创经皮肾镜 经尿道输尿管镜 Ureteral calculi Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy Transurethral ureteroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1卢德祥,程险峰,孙大鹏,刘松梅,杨冬梅,亢渐.经皮肾镜取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(11):836-837. 被引量:19
  • 2陈小刚,张青汉,董能本,叶绪龙,潘卫斌,彭伟.微创经皮肾穿刺碎石术和经尿道输尿管镜下碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的疗效比较[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(8):614-615. 被引量:8
  • 3Zeng GH,Zhao Z,Wan SP. et al. Minimally invasive per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renalcalyceal stones : a comparative analysis of over 10000 cas-es[J]. J Endourol,2013,8(7) :557-562.
  • 4Lei M ,Zhu W,Wan SP. et aL Safety and efficacy of minimallyinvasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with au-tosomal dominant polycystic kidneys disease [J]. J Endourol,2013,8(7):892-899.
  • 5Zeng G,Mai Z’Zhao Z,et al. Treatment of upper urinary cal-culi with Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy : a single-center experience with 12,482 con-secutive patients over 20 years [J], Urolithiasis, 2013,41 (3):225-229.
  • 6Abdelhafez MF,Amend B,Bedke J,et al. Minimally inva-sive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative study ofthe management of small and large renal stones [J]. Urology,2013,81(2):241-245.
  • 7Kumar A,Nanda B,Kumar N,et al. A prospective random-ized comparison between shock wave lithotripsy and semi-rigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteric stones < 2 cm:a sin-gle center experience [J]. J Endourol,2013,9(5) :89-92.
  • 8Khalil M. Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone :extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopywith holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy [J]. Urol Ann,2013,5(2):88-92.
  • 9Ito H,Kawahara T,Terap H,et al. Evaluation of preoper-ative measurement of stone surface area as a predictor ofstone-free status after combined ureteroscopy with holmi-um laser lithotripsy : a single-center experience [J], J En-dourol,2013,27(6) :715-721.
  • 10董振佳,王强东,肖旭.微创经皮肾取石和经尿道输尿管镜碎石治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石疗效比较[J].实用临床医学(江西),2008,9(3):57-59. 被引量:10

共引文献25

同被引文献19

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部