期刊文献+

超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞用于剖宫产术术后镇痛的效果研究 被引量:11

Effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia in patients with cesarean delivery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察超声引导下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞用于剖宫产术患者术后镇痛的效果。方法择期腰硬联合麻醉下行剖宫产术患者60例,ASA分级Ⅰ级或Ⅱ级,分为罗哌卡因组(Ⅰ组)和等量0.9%氯化钠溶液组(Ⅱ组)。手术完成后在超声引导下行双侧TAP阻滞,Ⅰ组每侧注射0.375%罗哌卡因20ml,Ⅱ组每侧注射等容量0.9%氯化钠溶液。术毕所有患者均行经静脉患者自控镇痛(PCIA)。比较两组术后2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h静态和动态视觉模拟疼痛(VAS)评分,记录两组术后镇痛泵第一次按压时间、24 h镇痛泵按压次数、镇痛满意度、PCIA的用量以及不良反应的发生情况。结果两组术后2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h的静态VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t分别=1.85、1.96、1.99、1.96、1.63,P均>0.05)。Ⅰ组术后2 h、6 h、12 h和24 h时点的动态VAS评分明显低于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(t分别=4.46、4.95、5.13、3.08,P均<0.05)。Ⅰ组术后镇痛泵第一次按压时间比Ⅱ组延迟(t=6.82,P<0.05),24 h镇痛泵按压次数比Ⅱ组少(t=6.17,P<0.05),镇痛满意度比Ⅱ组高(χ2=4.32,P<0.05),术后24 h内PCIA使用量比Ⅱ组更少(t=7.32,P<0.05)。两组均未见与TAP穿刺相关的并发症,两组术后恶心、呕吐等不良反应发生率的比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2分别=0.23、0.10,P均>0.05)。结论超声引导下TAP阻滞用于剖宫产术患者的术后镇痛效果好,减少了PCIA的需要量。 Objective To observe the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane(TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in patients with caesarean delivery. Medthods Sixty ASA Ⅰ- Ⅱ patients that scheduled for elective caesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups with 30 cases in each: ropivacaine group(groupⅠ) and same volume saline group(groupⅡ). The ultrasound-guided bilateral TAP block was performed at the end of surgery, and 0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml was injected to each side in group Ⅰ while the equal volume of normal saline was injected in group Ⅱ. After that, all patients received patient controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA). The visual analogue scale(VAS) scores at 2-hour, 6-hour, 12-hour, 24-hour and 48-hour at rest and movement, the time to require the first bolus, and the numbers of bolus in 24 hours, the satisfaction on analgesia, total consumption of PCIA and the adverse reactions were all recorded and compared. Results The VAS scores at rest of two groups were not statistical different at 2-hour, 6-hour, 12-hour, 24-hour and 48-hour(t=1.85, 1.96, 1.99, 1.96, 1.63,P〈0.05). The VAS scores at movement in group Ⅰ were significantly lower at 2-hour, 6-hour, 12-hour and 24-hour after operation than group Ⅱ(t=4.46, 4.95, 5.13, 3.08, P〈0.05). In group Ⅰ, the time to require the first bolus was significantly longer than group Ⅱ(t=6.82,P〈0.05), the compression numbers were significantly less(t=6.17,P〈0.05), the satisfaction on analgesia were significantly better(χ^2=4.32,P〈0.05) and the consumption of PCIA were significantly lower(t =7.32, P 〈0.05). TAP block-related complications were not found in two groups, and the incidence of postoperative nausea,vomiting had no statistic differences(χ^2=0.23, 0.10,P〉 0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided TAP block forpostoperative analgesia is effective in patients with elective caesarean delivery and the requirement ofPCIA analgesics is decreased.
出处 《全科医学临床与教育》 2015年第1期25-28,共4页 Clinical Education of General Practice
关键词 腹横肌平面阻滞 术后镇痛 剖宫产 transversus abdominis plane block postoperative analgesia caesarean delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1吴新民,Hess PE,Oriol NE,等.产科麻醉原理与临床[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:75.
  • 2Galloway S, Chimhanda M, Sloan T, et al. Pain scores are not predictive of pain medication utilization [J]. Pain Res Treat, 2011,11(10):987468.
  • 3Melzack R.The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods[J].Pain, 1975,1 (3) : 277-299.
  • 4Leung AY. Postoperative pain management in obstetric anes- thesia-new challenges and solutions [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2004,16( 1 ) : 57-65.
  • 5Kiribayashi M,Inagaki Y,Nishimura Y,et al. Caudal block- ade shortens the time to walking exercise in elderly patients following low back surgery[J].J Anesth,2010, 24(2): 192-196.
  • 6Rezon WM, Tran TM, Ashton MW, et al. Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves: a new undarstanding of the innervation of the anterror abdominal wall[J]. Clin Anat, 2008,21 (4) : 325-333.
  • 7Gasanova I, Grant E, Way M, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominal plane block with muhimodal analgesi- a for pain management after total abdominal hysterectomy [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2013,288( 1 ) : 105-111.
  • 8Salman AE, Yetisir F, Yurekli B, et al .The efficacy of the semi-bhnd approach of transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized double-blind study[J]. Local Reg Anesth, 2013 , 18(6) : 1-7.
  • 9Cho S, Kim YJ, Kim DY, et al. Postoperative analgesic ef- fects of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for open appendectomy[J]. Chung SS J Korean Surg Soc, 2013,85 (3) : 128-133.
  • 10Costello JF, Moore AR, Wieczorek PM, et al. The transver- sus abdominis plane block, when used as part of a multi- modal regimen inclusive of intrathecal morphine, does not improve analgesia after cesarean delivery[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2009 ,34(6):586-589.

二级参考文献6

  • 1O'Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2006,31:91.
  • 2McDonnell JG, O'Donnell BD, Farrell T, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block:a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2007,32 : 399-404.
  • 3McDonnell JG,O'Donnell B,Curley G, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg,2007, 104:193-197.
  • 4Randall IM, Costello J, Carvalho JC. Transversus abdominis plane block in a patient with debilitating pain from an abdominal wall hematoma following cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106:1928.
  • 5Tornero-Campello G. Transversus abdominis plane block should be compared with epidural for postoperative analgesia after abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg, 2007, 105 : 281-282.
  • 6Farooq M,Carey M. A case of liver trauma with a blunt regional anesthesia needle while performing transversus abdomihis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2008,33:274-275.

共引文献37

同被引文献61

引证文献11

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部