期刊文献+

食管癌术后纵隔淋巴结转移容积旋转调强与静态调强放疗的剂量学对比研究 被引量:3

A dosimetric comparison of VMAT and static IMRT to treat mediastinal metastasis from esophageal carcinoma after surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较容积旋转调强(volumetric modulated arc therapy,VMAT)与静态调强(intensity modulated radiotherapy,IMRT)放疗技术治疗食管癌术后纵隔转移淋巴结的剂量学差异。方法对25例胸段食管癌术后纵隔淋巴结转移患者分别设计逆时针VMAT计划和5野IMRT计划,在满足靶区处方剂量要求下,通过剂量体积直方图(DVH)评价和比较2种类型治疗计划的适形性指数(CI),均匀性指数(HI),脊髓最大剂量(Dmax)、V40(Vx为xGy剂量曲线包含相应器官体积百分数),双肺V5、V10V20、V30胸腔胃V40、V50、平均剂量(Dmean),心脏V40、V50、Dmean。并比较2种治疗计划总机器跳数(monitorunit,MU)和治疗时间。结果全组25例患者的VMAT计划和IMRT计划均能满足临床剂量学要求,在靶区覆盖率相似的前提下,VMAT计划靶区(PTV)CI优于IMRT计划,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),HI差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。与IMRT计划相比,VMAT计划中双肺V5、V10有所上升,V20、V30明显降低(P〈0.05);脊髓Dmax显著降低(P〈0.05);胸腔胃V40、V50明显减少(P〈0.05);心脏V30V40、Dmean略有上升趋势,但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论VMAT靶区适形度更高,降低周围重要正常组织高剂量范围,这可能减少正常组织放疗反应,同时可通过降低MU和缩短实际治疗时间,提高肿瘤治疗效果。 Objective To compare the dosimetric difference between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and static intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) when applied to treat mediastinal metastasis from esophageal carcino- ma after surgery. Methods A total of 25 patients diagnosed with mediastinal metastasis from esophageal carcinoma after surgery were included in the current study. VMAT plans with a single are and IMRT plans were designed for each pa- tient. Both plans were compared for conformal index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), spinal Dmax and V40; V5, V10, V20 and V30 in the lungs; V40, V50 and Dmean in the intrathoraeie stomach; and V40, V50 and Dmean in the heart through dose -volume histogram (DVH) , when sufficient doses were provided within targeted regions. The monitor units (MU) and treatment time (TT) were also evaluated. Results All plans designed for 25 patients could provide enough doses for clinical use. On the basis of similar coverage within the targeted regions, VMAT plans produced better CI than IMRT plans ( P 〈 0.05 ), despite of little statistical difference in HI ( P 〉 0.05 ). Compared with IMRT plans, VMAT reported increased V5 and V10 and remarkably declined V20 and V30 ( P 〈 0.05 ) in the lungs ; significantly lower spinal Dmax ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; reduced V40 and V50 in the intrathoraeic stomach ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; as slightly increased V30, V40 and Dmean in the heart. The average MU and treatment time of VMAT were reduced. Conclusion VMAT plans produce higher values of CI in the target regions and reduce the dose range surrounding normal tissues, which can be adopted to weaken the side effects within normal tissues and improve efficacy through reduction of MU and treatment duration.
出处 《徐州医学院学报》 CAS 2014年第12期847-850,共4页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Xuzhou
关键词 容积旋转调强 静态调强 食管癌术后纵隔淋巴结转移 剂量学 volumetric modulated arc therapy static intensity modulated radiotherapy mediastinal metastasis from esophageal carcinoma after surgery dosimetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献47

  • 1黄镜,蔡锐刚,孟平均,张明娟,崔成旭,杨林,储大同,孙燕,王金万.紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗晚期食管鳞癌[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(12):753-755. 被引量:96
  • 2贾丽,王仁本,于金明,孟繁会,郭英华,李金丽,朱昆莉.食管癌放疗后复发的再放疗32例疗效观察[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(11):863-864. 被引量:34
  • 3Shu-Lian Wang,Zhongxing Liao,Helen Liu(,Jaffer Ajani,Stephen Swisher,James D Cox,Ritsuko Komaki.Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(34):5501-5508. 被引量:27
  • 4Otto K. Volumetric modulated therapy:IMRT in a single gantry arc [J]. Med Phys,2008,35:310-317.
  • 5Verbakel WFAR, Cuijpers JP, Hoffmans D, el al. Volumetric in- tensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head and neck cancer:a comparative planning and dosimetric study[ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009,74:252-259.
  • 6Xing L, Lin ZX, Donaldson SS, et al. Dosimetric effects of pa- tient displaeement and eollimator and gantry angle misalignment [ J]. Radiother Oneol,2000,56( 1 ) :97-108.
  • 7Van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy[ J]. Semin Radi- at 0ncol,2004,14( 1 ) :52-64.
  • 8Mohan R, Wu Q, Manning M, et al. Radiobiological considera- tions in the design of fractionation strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancers [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000,46 ( 3 ) :619- 630.
  • 9Stroom JC, De Boer HC, Huizenga H, et al. Inclusion of geomet- rical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 43 (4) :905-919.
  • 10Van Herk M, Remeijer P, Rasch C, et al. The probability of cor- rect target dosage-dose population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000, 47(4) :1121-1135.

共引文献154

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部