摘要
社会契约论是一个合法性论题——社会契约论认为,近代社会人们服从国家的政治义务建立在"同意"的基础上,从国家的起源看,国家的建制经历了人们相互协议达成契约的过程,符合此程序建制的国家就具有合法性。社会契约论内部在自然状态、自然权利、自然法、契约及主权的组成和性质等方面都有不同甚至相反的观点,使社会契约论充满了理论张力。尽管有时候社会契约论被认为不合时宜,但不久就又显示其理论价值和实践影响力。这种张力在当代表现为社会契约论在卢梭式和康德式——这两种方向上的复兴。
The social contract is a legal issue which refers to the social contract theory. In modern society, people obey the country＇s political obligation on the basis of agreement and from the origin of the country. The establishment of the country has experienced the process of people＇s mutual agreement to reach a contract, in which a country conforms to the program with legitimacy. In terms of a social contract theory, the state of nature, natural rights, composition and properties of natural law, contracts and sovereignty, there are differcnt or ew＇.n opposite views, which make social contract theory full of tension. Although sometimes the social contract is considered inappropriate, but it will show its influence on the theoretical value and practice very soon. Contemporarily the tension is likely to show that the social contract is prone to the Rousseau and the Kantian-the revival of the two directions.
出处
《怀化学院学报》
2014年第12期39-42,共4页
Journal of Huaihua University
基金
湖南省教育厅一般项目"中国梦的政治哲学研究"(13C718)
关键词
社会契约论
合法性
同意
自然权利
统治权威
the social contract
legitimacy
agreement
natural rights
the ruling authority
