期刊文献+

伤椎内植骨联合骨水泥强化治疗重度骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折初步疗效观察 被引量:2

Primary curative effect of vertebral body bone graft and bone cement augmentation in treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨椎内植骨联合骨水泥强化治疗重度骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折(SVCF)的初步疗效。方法对非植骨组(30例)和植骨组(19例)患者手术前后疼痛程度、病变椎体前缘高度、Cobb角,以及骨水泥渗漏、邻近椎体骨折等并发症情况进行观察,并进行统计分析。结果无肺栓塞及神经并发症发生,2组患者疼痛均明显缓解,伤椎高度和Cobb角矫正较术前明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。随访2-5年,平均3年2个月,骨水泥渗漏非植骨组5例,植骨组1例,邻近椎体再骨折非植骨组4例,植骨组1例。2组在骨水泥渗漏率、邻近椎体骨折发生率方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论椎内植骨联合骨水泥强化在降低骨水泥渗漏、邻近椎体骨折发生率上具有优势,是一种较理想的治疗方法。 Objective To explore the primary curative effect of vertebral body bone graft and bone cement augmentation in the treatment of severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures. Methods The curative effect was observed and the statistical difference between the control group(30 cases) and the bone graft group(19 cases) before and after operation were analyzed. The therapeutic efficacy was assessed by visual analogue scale(VAS), the anterior vertebral height, Cobb angle, bone cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture. Results No neurological symptomatic and other severe complications were found in all patients. The VAS scores, the anterior vertebral height and Cobb angle improved significantly after the surgery( P 〈0.05). All patients were followed up for 2-5 years, average 3 years and 2 months, the bone cement leakage occurred in 5 cases of the control group and 1 case in the bone graft group, the adjacent vertebral fracture occurred in 4 cases of the control group and 1 case in the bone graft group. There was significant difference between two groups in the bone cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fracture(P 〈0.05). Conclusion The treatment for severe osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures by vertebral body bone graft and bone cement augmentation can obtain satisfactory curative effect. It is an ideal treatment method.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2015年第1期54-56,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
基金 徐州市科学技术局自然科学基金(XZZD1356)
关键词 椎内植骨 骨水泥强化 重度骨质疏松 椎体压缩骨折 Vertebral body bone graft Bone cement augmentation Severe osteoporotic Vertebral compression fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献64

  • 1唐迎九,杨惠林,章洪喜,王海,陈文忠,苏虹.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折体外力学实验研究[J].江苏大学学报(医学版),2004,14(30):199-201. 被引量:3
  • 2施俊武,池永龙,郭晓山.磷酸钙骨水泥注射椎体成形术的生物力学研究[J].浙江创伤外科,2005,10(4):238-241. 被引量:2
  • 3王程,王文军,宋西正.三种椎体填充材料在胸腰椎骨折微创治疗中的应用比较[J].医学临床研究,2007,24(5):803-805. 被引量:7
  • 4胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:708-719.
  • 5Li KC, Li AY, Hsieh CH, et al. Transpedicle body augmenter in painful osteoporotic compression fractures [J]. Eur Spine J,2007,16 (5): 589-598.
  • 6Lam S,khoo LT. A novel percutaneous system for bon graft delivery and containment for elevation and stabilization of vertebral compression fractures: technical note[J]. Eurosurgical Focus, 2005,18(3):E10.
  • 7Leferink M, Keizer E,O osterhuis K, et al.functional outcome in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with dorsal instrumentation and transpedicular cancellous bone grafting [J]. Eur Spine J,2003,12: 261-267.
  • 8Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Associ-ation Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire(JOACMEQ): part4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee onlow back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical out-come committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association[J]. J OrthopSci,2008,13(1):25-31.
  • 9Heini PF. The current treatment a survey of osteoporotic fracturetreatment osteoporotic spine fractures the spine surgeons perspective[J]. Osteoporotic Int, 2005,16(12). 85-92.
  • 10赵必增,杜正通,李家顺,等.经皮椎体成形术治疗椎体骨质疏松性椎体骨折的初步观察[J].中国脊柱脊慷杂志,2003,13(2>:105-106.

共引文献49

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部